The Real Beneficiaries of 0bama’s Middle East Policy
Why would 0bama support a democracy movement in Egypt which removes our last remaining Islamic ally in the region when 85% of the population supports the annihilation of Israel and 90% supports Sharia Law?
Yet he leaves popular uprisings in Iran where the population is much more pro-western totally without so much as a wink or nod?
He plans on leaving Iran without a major counterbalance in the region by leaving Iraq powerless.
He supported terrorists by helping them removing Kadafi.
Add this to the fact that he suggested Israel go back to the 1967 borders before outrage from all sides caused him to walk the statements back.
Who really benefits from this radical change in the US Middle Eastern policy?
There really are two winners: Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood. He has hinted at his support of the Brotherhood by calling them a mostly political not ideological group, but he had to retract those factually ridiculous statements of his administration.
But the fact that he would allow his underlings to make them to begin with speaks volumes.
Those who have called 0bama a Manchurian Candidate might have been correct in this regard to this.
If anyone has a different interpretation that explains 0bama’s motivation, I’d like to hear it.
If anyone has a different interpretation that explains 0bama’s motivation, I’d like to hear it.
Me too.