Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic voter: Focus on ‘sinful inequalities’ called core strength
Catholic San Francisco ^ | October 26th, 2011 | CNS

Posted on 10/26/2011 9:12:24 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

NEW YORK (CNS) – Catholic voters who seek the facts, study the issues and know what the church teaches are well-equipped to counter electoral negativity and partisan sniping, said panelists at “Keeping the Faith in a Season of Spin,” a conference at Fordham University Oct. 18.

“The core competency of Catholics in the public square is to repeat the catechism’s emphasis on sinful inequalities,” said John DiIulio, professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania and first director of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in the George W. Bush administration.

Today’s candidates are not talking much about disparities between the rich and the poor, or the needs of the weak, he said, but “people who imbibe Catholic social teaching” should put it on the political agenda.

Those who follow the principles outlined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church are immunized from the “spin” of political rhetoric, he said.

“In the Catholic tradition, you’re not allowed to be either addicted to government or allergic to it,” Dilulio said, adding that government should be related to serving the common good.

Tom Perriello, a Virginia Democrat who served in Congress from 2008 to 2010, said religion and faith have a place in politics. “Motives matter. Faith is one of the things that shapes values systems,” he said.

If candidates are authentic about describing the influence of faith on their life choices, they win a certain respect, even from people who disagree with them, he said.

Jesuit Father Thomas J. Reese of the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University said Catholics “should never become captive to any single party. Every four years, we’re the swing voters who decide elections and we should treasure that.”

He said Catholic clergy should continue the tradition of not running for office and bishops should continue to speak on issues while avoiding partisan politics.

Father Reese said Catholics must realize that appeals to Catholic theology and religious authority will not be persuasive to everyone. “Things like excommunication and denying Communion because of votes are not only stupid, but harmful to the goals,” he said, because it gets the candidate off message and makes certain issues appear to be of interest only to the Catholic community and not the wider electorate.

DiIulio said the disciplining of Catholic candidates by Catholic clergy has backfired. “People have thought better about it. Do you really want most of the ink spilled and the lines written on this, instead of the issues?” he asked.

Father Reese said Catholics need to distinguish between specific principles and specific legislation and remember that the role of religion is to motivate people to love, inspire self-sacrifice and work for justice.

Gerald Seib, Washington bureau chief of The Wall Street Journal, said economic justice will likely be an issue in the presidential election. “It’s starting to rise to the top. Nasty things are happening,” whose effect will last beyond the end of the recession, he said. “Marriage is being ground down by economic pressures.”

Seib said the growing number of long-term unemployed is a pressing social, economic and moral issue. “People are descending into poverty and economic anxiety,” he said. “They’re moving down the economic scale.”

Perriello said the Catholic bishops missed an opportunity to provide moral leadership during the 2006 mortgage crisis, but have been “strong on immigration” because the church is a primary structure for immigrants.


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: catholic
“The core competency of Catholics in the public square is to repeat the catechism’s emphasis on sinful inequalities,” said John DiIulio, professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania and first director of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in the George W. Bush administration. Today’s candidates are not talking much about disparities between the rich and the poor, or the needs of the weak, he said, but “people who imbibe Catholic social teaching” should put it on the political agenda.

Those who follow the principles outlined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church are immunized from the “spin” of political rhetoric, he said. “In the Catholic tradition, you’re not allowed to be either addicted to government or allergic to it,” Dilulio said, adding that government should be related to serving the common good....

....Jesuit Father Thomas J. Reese of the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University said Catholics “should never become captive to any single party. Every four years, we’re the swing voters who decide elections and we should treasure that.” He said Catholic clergy should continue the tradition of not running for office and bishops should continue to speak on issues while avoiding partisan politics.

Father Reese said Catholics must realize that appeals to Catholic theology and religious authority will not be persuasive to everyone. “Things like excommunication and denying Communion because of votes are not only stupid, but harmful to the goals,” he said, because it gets the candidate off message and makes certain issues appear to be of interest only to the Catholic community and not the wider electorate. DiIulio said the disciplining of Catholic candidates by Catholic clergy has backfired. “People have thought better about it. Do you really want most of the ink spilled and the lines written on this, instead of the issues?” he asked.

1 posted on 10/26/2011 9:12:25 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Couldn't "inequalities" also be called "diversity"?


2 posted on 10/26/2011 9:53:09 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Fall on your knees before Christ, your only salvation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

To all you Roman Catholics:

What is a “sinful inequality”; who defines it, who decides it, other than via a Marxian political interpretation.

Yes, one should be compassionate; one should be giving; and should help those in need. There is nothing in any of that that defines “unequal” as “sinful”.

No wonder GWBush was a domestic policy failure.


3 posted on 10/26/2011 10:00:32 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson