Mark that was crude, but so to the point!!!
People are not thinking that is the trouble.
This is an emotional decision, not a rational or logical one. Whoever has a homosexual relative or friend who at least appears to be a contibuting member of society may present the argument that since they are a worthwhile human being, then they should not only have their particular proclivities allowed, they should also be subsidized by the government in the interests of 'equality' and 'fairness' and 'opportunity'.
Back to the glory hole and to the airport bathroom stalls...