Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From the article: These policies are guided by LDS doctrine. Doctrine and Covenants 134 is a declaration of beliefs regarding government. Its contents contain...guiding precepts...

Well, let's look at a Mormon "guiding precept" found in that same Mormon "scriptural" passage -- Doctrine & Covenants 134 -- that this Mormon author conviently doesn't mention...shall we?

Hit the rewind button. It’s mid-1835. Lds foundational "prophet" Joseph Smith is churning out new “Scripture.” Smith is taking aim at new converts. But in that time, did he believe the Mormon “gospel” to be aimed at slaves? (No, not unless express “permission” was granted by their “owners”).

Could you imagine a verse still applicable today—one similar to the Mormon scripture of Doctrine & Covenants 134:12—which would tell you in effect that yes, the gospel was for women who are sexually trafficked--but only if their Pimp-owner says "Yes?".

I mean, imagine if you will, for a moment, that you are the God of the universe; God of every planet; God of the earth; Creator of every person. Imagine for a moment you are speaking forth universal eternal truth. And then imagine that someone claims you (as God) made the following “Scriptural” statement:

”We believe it just to preach the gospel to the nations of the earth, and warn the righteous to save themselves from the corruption of the world; but we do not believe it right to interfere with bond-servants, neither preach the gospel to, nor baptize them contrary to the will and wish of their masters, nor to meddle with or influence them in the least to cause them to be dissatisfied with their situations in this life, thereby jeopardizing the lives of men; such interference we believe to be unlawful and unjust, and dangerous to the peace of every government allowing human beings to be held in servitude.”

D&C 134:12 is LDS “Doctrine” that has never been removed or rescinded!!! This passages makes it quite clear – in contrast to the apostle Paul who vied for the religious freedom of Onesimus while treating him as a full Christian brother and encouraged Philemon to do the same--somehow, LDS think that "religious freedom" applies to everyone except slaves!

D&C 134:12, written in 1835 pro-slavery America, made it quite clear that instead of the Mormons having a universal god who issued eternal truth applicable to all cultures, he is instead an American-sounding god who speaks only in King James English & was beholden to the American slavery industry.

D&C 134:12 "settles" the issue for the Mormon: Are slaves & trafficking victims worthy of the "gospel?" LDS Answer? Nope! "neither preach the gospel to, nor baptize them..." says LDS "Scripture.

And why not? Well, says D&C 134:12: We don't want ya ta meddle with the Mastuhs' business “property,” or to say it as precisely as LDS "scripture" says it: nor to meddle with or influence them in the least to cause them to be dissatisfied with their situations in this life...

(Nah. We can't have unhappy slaves or trafficking victims now, can we? Too disturbing to their "stations" of life, eh?)

Now what are the ultimate reasons for this again? D&C 134:12 provides the answer:

Reason #1: ...such interference we believe to be unlawful and unjust... (There ya have it...wouldn't want to be "unjust" by giving slaves the gospel & baptizing them, would ya?)

Reason #2: ...and dangerous to the peace of every government allowing human beings to be held in servitude. (And, of course, the "closer": Wouldn't want to disturb the peace & quiet of slavery-sanctioning governments, now would ya?)

Also, keep in mind that each Mormon, when determined by their bishop as to whether they are eligible for temple access, are asked interview questions.

The 19th-century version of Q. #2 asked by Mormon bishops of their members -- the longest Q asked was this: Do you speak against...any principle taught in the Bible, Book of Mormon, book of Doctrine and Covenants...

If this question had been retained, contemporary Mormons speaking against polygamy would have to answer, "Oh, yes, I speak against D&C 132 all the time!!!" Or, if they baptized a woman caught in the sex trafficking industry as a sex slave, they would need to say, "Oh, yes, I've directly opposed D&C 134:12!!!"

3 posted on 06/29/2011 4:03:32 PM PDT by Colofornian (I already have a God as my leader. Why do I need ANOTHER one as POTUS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian

meddling mormon placemarker


4 posted on 06/29/2011 4:09:36 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson