Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

“So the Apostles were “temps”? “

I don’t mean to be perjorative. I suppose they were temps in one sense of the word. You could call Moses a “temp,” in that case, too. The only way I can listen to Moses today is to read what he wrote. Ultimately, though, it was what God wrote, as it was inspired. Similarly with the apostles.


22 posted on 05/09/2011 11:52:20 AM PDT by Persevero (We don't need Superman -- we have the Special Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
The only way I can listen to Moses today is to read what he wrote. Ultimately, though, it was what God wrote, as it was inspired. Similarly with the apostles.

This is exactly right--an Apostolic faith is ultimately a biblical faith--as understood by the Church broadly through time...

This idea, that the bible must be interpreted as a body (not sitting alone in your room...)--is what prevents (more) schism, and also the reason behind the great Protestant confessions.

I really don't understand why the E. Orthodox and Roman Churches are not wary of the extra-biblical deposits of tradition that can (and do...very much so) acrue over time, when a human authority-on-earth is given the full and final authority over and above God's Word.

In fear of subjective interpretation by the individual, they trade a subjective interpretation by a group.

25 posted on 05/09/2011 12:05:13 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson