I was watching a History channel show on this. They were saying the image on the Shroud is 3-d. Encoded in 3-d, not something applied to the surface. And it is the only such image of that type on an artifact in the world. Which makes it unique.
As to how that image got on there, if it is some type of forgery, begs the question: Who would have the knowledge and technique to do it so long ago?
Maybe the builders of Gobekli Tepe would know.
—
Me also. Odd how the image turned out to look almost exactly like almost every other representation of Christ, down to the traditional placement of the wounds on the hands.
Did you catch how angry one of the scientists became when he described the condition of the body he had revealed?
For those who did not see this episode of “History”, they kept prattling on about how the image one sees, is not the real image but a data set for those who can decode it.
They also “conclusively” proved that the image was created by a scanning laser, similar to one found in many printers. Who ever did it scanned the body from the outside, fixing the form on the cloth.
However, the “scientists” while claiming the Christ converted to pure light in the tomb - thus creating the image to be found by those who understand, made their proof by scanning a model from the outside - the direct opposite of what had to happen if their light conversion theory was correct.
Me too - I never did give the shroud much credence but the more people try and disprove it the more it confounds them - the History Channel has done a couple of good programs on the shroud. The information contained therein overcame my questions and objections. It doesn’t make any difference to my level of faith in God but it certainly is amazing!
Mel