Replies

God Bless you, Judge Roll.

Ditto - not a word in the media about the judge or his life and work.

Top US Federal Judge assassinated after threat to Obama agenda

Snip:
A Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the top US Federal Judge for the State of Arizona was assassinated barely 72-hours after he made a critical ruling against the Obama administrations plan to begin the confiscation of their citizen’s private retirement and banking accounts in order to stave off their nations imminent economic collapse, and after having the US Marshals protecting him removed.

According to this SVR report, Federal Judge John McCarthy Roll was the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona who this past Friday issued what is called a “preliminary ruling” in a case titled “United States of America v. $333,520.00 in United States Currency et al” [Case Number: 4:2010cv00703 Filed: November 30, 2010] wherein he stated he was preparing to rule against Obama’s power to seize American citizens money without clear and convincing evidence of a crime being committed.

The case being ruled on by Judge Roll, this report continues, was about bulk cash smuggling into or out of the United States that the Obama administration claimed was their right to seize under what are called Presidential Executive Orders, instead of using existing laws. The Obama administration used as support for their claim before Judge Roll, the SVR says, the seizing of all American citizens’ gold, in 1933, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s signing of Executive Order 6102, which was ruled at the time to be constitutional.

I tried to check on the accuracy of that claim by looking on the docket for that case in PACER. They have no new ruling listed. I don’t know exactly what that means because I don’t know if a “preliminary ruling” would show on a docket, or how a person would find out if he had indicated in any way what he was going to rule.

When I brought up this subject others immediately said that there would be no motive to assassinate Judge Roll if the ruling had already been made. For there to be no ruling on it - or for there to at least be no official record of a ruling on it - would leave the case to be decided by whoever Obama appoints to replace Judge Roll.

It’s called stacking the deck - like Obama did by having 2 “justices” (cough) on SCOTUS whose salaries and positions totally depend on Obama not being found ineligible to be POTUS refusing to recuse themselves when eligibility cases come up for conference - in spite of a clear and direct financial and personal conflict of interest.

The fact that the stories about how Judge Roll came to be at that event and who might have known he was going to be there are constantly changing, as well as discrepancies on who found what documents that show Giffords as the intended target... leads me to think there may be more to this story than we are being told, and the people doing the investigating are not particularly interested in making a set of genuine, documented facts and timeline available to the public. The “facts” from the sheriff’s office and the FBI are constantly shifting, and that doesn’t sit well with me.