Posted on 01/12/2011 8:05:52 AM PST by markomalley
Miguel Diaz, the US ambassador to the Holy See, gave an interview to Vatican Radio after Pope Benedict’s address about the state of the world in which he claimed that faith groups in the US did not have a problem with intolerant secularism.
In response to Pope Benedict’s warning against the marginalisation of religion in Western society in the name of a false pluralism Ambassador Diaz said:
‘“One of the great treasures of American society has been religious tolerance, its at the heart of what it is to be American. We do not have this kind of radical secularism that dismisses the positive contribution of religious figures to society and religious ideas from our society, and in fact, you know we probably come very close to what the Holy Father has characterized as a positive form of a secular society.”
Protect the Pope comment: This is like hearing the Chinese Premier saying there’s no problem with human rights in China! If there’s no problem with radical secularism in the USA why did President Obama insist that religious imagery was covered up when he gave an address from a Catholic University? If there’s no radical secularism in the USA why did President Obama and Secretary for State Clinton start talking about ‘freedom of worship’ instead of ‘freedom of religion’? If there is no problem with radical secularism why did President Obama omit the word, ‘Creator ‘ when he recited the Declaration of Independence? And these are just a couple of examples that spring readily to mind!
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=8864
http://www.radiovaticana.org/en1/Articolo.asp?c=453124
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDzi7txYHFA&feature=player_embedded
Protect the Pope ^ | 1/12/11
Posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:05:52 AM by markmyword
Miguel El Diablo, the Obummer Satanic US ambassador to the Holy See, gave an interview to Vatican Radio after Pope Benedict’s address about the state of the world
in which he claimed that faith groups in the US did not have a problem with intolerant secularism
since there is no intolerant secularism in Hell, where there is a lot of Global Warming
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
I wonder, how was Mr. Diaz able to say that with a straight face! That’s nuts.
Prayers for the Pope as well as this apostate ambassador. The ambassador needs a re-version to the REAL Catholic Faith.
Technically the philosophy of naturalism advocated since the nineteenth century, first in England and then elsewhere. It is a closed system that affirms that human existence and destiny are fully explainable in terms of this world without reference to eternity. On its social side, secularism promotes the advancement of humanity's lot in this life, and charges Christianity with indifference to poverty and suffering because of its alleged preoccupation with God and the life to come.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.