Posted on 07/14/2010 4:04:25 PM PDT by NYer
Many religions have laws governing ritual purity. The Roman Catholic Church, for example, ruled that under its own laws, a gluten-free wheat wafer cannot be used to confect the Eucharist. Unless you are a canonist or otherwise versed in this sort of thing, please, reader, spare me complaints about this. It is just as parochial to complain about why Jews can't eat bacon, Muslims can't drink wine, and so forth. It is what it is, and there are reasons within the various traditions for these taboos. The point is, gluten-free wheat wafers are unacceptable for the Eucharist in Catholic churches, because the Church teaches that they literally cannot be transformed into the Body of Christ by the priest. For Catholics and Orthodox, the bread literally becomes the flesh of God; you can't just use any old bread, or the ritual will not work. That's why making sure you have the right elements (e.g., wheat that's "kosher" for Eucharist) is so important. That's got The Ochlophobist wondering about whether or not bread made from genetically modified (GMO) wheat can pass these purity laws, both in the Catholic and Orthodox churches. Depending on how the various churches rule on the GMO wheat matter, this could be a huge problem, given how quickly GMO crops are becoming the standard in this country.
Which brings Ochlophobist to a critical point. Emphasis mine:
Once GMO wheat takes over the market, going to the store and getting a non-GMO, unbleached white baking wheat flour is going to cost a lot more than it does today. I suppose even the poorest Orthodox parishes could still afford it, but nonetheless there is something disheartening in having to go to an upscale store or the upscale aisle at your local grocery in order to purchase something which is natural and relatively unmolested. As we see in so many arenas in the late modern American life, what was once a good quotidian human act or experience shared by the many is now only kept for the rich. One pays top dollar today to eat the sorts of foods once eaten by peasants - a simple stew with a couple ounces of pasture fed beef and organic vegetables and grains which have been processed in a traditional manner might cost you $60 at the right place. Purchasing the requisite items at Whole Foods might still cost you $20. Thus unless you are a person of means, you either grow/raise the food yourself or you eat laboratory foods.
By the way, last summer as we drove to Colorado, we passed a Monsanto plant in the Texas panhandle. My wife hissed at it. What's that about? I asked. "Do you not understand what that company is all about?!" she shot back. And then she proceeded to tell me, chapter and verse, with the approximate vigor of Luther reading out his 95 Theses. This is the kind of thing she's talking about: in 2003, Monsanto sued a large Maine organic dairy for putting on its milk cartons a statement saying that its milk contains no artificial growth hormones; the agribusiness giant, which manufactures synthetic growth hormone used on milk cattle, said that the statement hurt its business. The dairy settled out of court with Monsanto, under terms that weren't disclosed. Ochlophobist writes:
When a company with $110 million a year in profits [the Maine dairy] cannot muster a serious fight against Monsanto simply to defend its right to state what it does not put into its milk, you can imagine the intimidation that your local family raw milk farmer feels when facing the prospects of fighting a dairy industry and state bureaucrats controlled by Monsanto who are dead set on keeping raw milk sales, even private sales, illegal.
I showed Julie this entry before I scheduled it to post. She said, "Oh, you haven't seen Food, Inc. yet. Wait till you see what Monsanto does to people who try to save seed."
A most disturbing ping!
Monsanto defenders always invoke how many millions of people are fed by GM and hybridized crops than otherwise. But when you look carefully at what the company is doing to block human access to ntaural food, seeds and virtually anything that can be grown, the resulting horror is immense.
Monsanto defends it’s totalitarian efforts to literally own and control all of the food on planet Earth “for the people” in the same way Stalin starved 20 million peasant farmers to death in the name of “saving” them from famine.
Except Monsanto goes one up on Stalin - the “food” it finally releases to people is literally no longer the same thing it started out being - and they they get laws passed so no one can find out what it really is.
If there is a corporation from the Black Lagoon, it’s Monsanto.
“One pays top dollar today to eat the sorts of foods once eaten by peasants”
That is, when they had something to eat. We live in a world where famine is unheard of and the leftists are determined to bring it back. It’s Natures way!
That is a pretty disturbed woman to be hissing at a company plant.
No famine.
They intend to bring back the wolves first... /sarc
Since we believe that Jesus Christ is present, Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity in BOTH species of the Holy Eucharist, a gluten-sensitive individual can receive full Communion by partaking of the Precious Blood alone.
The peasants may ultimately eat monsanto.
It is an interesting question. If we say that gluten free wheat is not true wheat, a reasonable sounding judgment, then where do we draw the line at other genetic modifications?
Unfortunately, that option is not easily available and takes special arrangement. Gluten is toxic for anyone with celiac disease and even small amounts are damaging. The disease is more common than usually realized, probably about 22 million, or 1 in 133 of the general US population.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT:
“Gluten-free” wheat isn’t wheat. It’s the starch content of wheat, only. So it’s not really bread.
If I were inclined to worry about the transubstantiability (how’s that for making up a word) of GM bread, it would be that it contains additives. However, my guess is that since the “additives” are part of the genetic makeup of the wheat (and thus, part of the living organism), they’re not really additives. On the other hand, then perhaps you could argue that it’s not a wheat plant, anymore, but a genetically similar plant.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT:
“Gluten-free” wheat isn’t wheat. It’s the starch content of wheat, only. So it’s not really bread.
If I were inclined to worry about the transubstantiability (how’s that for making up a word) of GM bread, it would be that it contains additives. However, my guess is that since the “additives” are part of the genetic makeup of the wheat (and thus, part of the living organism), they’re not really additives. On the other hand, then perhaps you could argue that it’s not a wheat plant, anymore, but a genetically similar plant.
transubstantiability.
14 syllables!
I must admit, I don’t know why the gluten-free bread is not allowed. However, I obey
The only seeds that Monsanto blocks access to are the seeds of the genetically modified plants that Monsanto invented and sells. Original varieties (heirloom seeds) are totally unaffected. And if you don't like GMO foods, don't buy them. Buy some heirloom varieties and grow your own.
Taking the position that both "bread from wheat" and "wine from grapes" must be used to have a valid Christian service pretty much writes off everybody in the Arctic regions of the world, and those with a natural intolerance of wheat gluten or alcohol.
That, BTW, is OVER ONE BILLION PEOPLE.
We have to wonder why God would separate the world of the living into two distinct groups based on chemistry over which they would have no control until modern times.
Think I'll go check on that sermon again where Jesus preaches "Modern Living Through Chemistry" ~ I'm sure it exists eh.
I’ve come to consider geneticly modifying organisms to be an ungodly practice. God created life to reproduce after its own kind. Gregor Mendel was working with this process. The GMO process,however, forces combinations outside of God’s order. Kind of like homosexual ‘marriage’. I agree with those who have said that GMO stands for “God, Move Over”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.