Posted on 04/01/2010 12:30:44 AM PDT by topher
Wednesday March 31, 2010Brooklyn Bishop: Catholic Church Won't be NYT's 'Personal Punching Bag'
By Kathleen Gilbert BROOKLYN, New York, March 31, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn has joined the chorus condemning the New York Times' attempt to implicate Pope Benedict XVI in clerical sex abuse cover-ups, saying that the Catholic Church will no longer stand to be treated as the paper's "personal punching bag." "Enough is enough! Two weeks of articles about a story from many decades ago, in the midst of the Most Holy Season of the Church year, is both callous and smacks of calumny," said the bishop during his homily at a March 30 Chrism Mass at the Cathedral Basilica of St. James. "I ask you to stand up with me and send a message loud and clear that the Pope, our Church, and our bishops and priests will no longer be the personal punching bag of The New York Times." DiMarzio took the opportunity to urge his listeners to "resolve to be vigilant in the protection of those young people in our care." "We must humbly seek forgiveness of those that have been robbed of innocence and the faithful whose trust was abused," he said. However, he went on to clarify the "the New York Times mischaracterization of the role of the Holy Father" regarding the case of Fr. Lawrence Murphy, who stood accused of having abused dozens of boys at a school for the deaf between the 1950s and 70s. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, run by Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) at the time, was informed of the accusations against Fr. Murphy in 1996 - two decades after the last allegations were made against the priest. The CDF instructed the local diocese to begin canonical proceedings against the priest, but ultimately recommended that Fr. Murphy, on account of his extremely poor health, simply have his pastoral activities restricted, and he died several months later. The NYT recently accused the CDF and Pope Benedict of neglecting the case and declining to properly punish the Fr. Murphy even though several American bishops repeatedly warned them that failure to act on the matter could embarrass the church. However, several Church officials and commentators, including the judicial vicar who handled Fr. Murphy's case, have since pointed out grave inaccuracies in the Times article. The Brooklyn bishop pointed out that the CDF did not even have competency over such canonical trials in 1996, when the case was portrayed as having gone to Cardinal Ratzinger. In addition, far from letting Fr. Murphy off the hook, DiMarzio noted that Fr. Murphy died before a verdict was rendered. A second case involving a Munich priest, he said, "is also presented as a definite error in judgment when all the facts are not known." "This evening, I am asking you to join me in making your displeasure known to the editors. I might even suggest cancelling our subscriptions to The New York Times, but we need to know what the enemy is saying," said DiMarzio. The bishop said that the Church's handling of such cases has vastly improved after years of initially failing to recognize, like other social institutions, that such abuse required imprisonment rather than treatment and rehabilitation. "The Church sought not to buy the silence of victims but to offer any assistance that would help in bringing about healing," he explained. "In most cases, the Church sought to not publicize the matter because of the scandal that it would cause and the family of the child did not want the matter to be public. In the intervening years, we have all learned a great deal and as a result, how we handle these cases is radically different. "Today, no one in society is doing more than the Catholic Church to protect children and bring about justice for those who were robbed of their innocence. We recognized first and foremost that we are dealing with criminal behavior. As such, it is immediately reported to the authorities because it is their competence to investigate crimes and not the Churchs," he said. "Our emphasis has moved from avoiding scandal to protecting children and so such behavior is immediately publicized, reported to the district attorney and not kept secret."
Judge of Abusive Priest Corrects 'Sloppy and Inaccurate' New York Times Smears against Pope Accusations of Pope Complicity in Abuse Cover-Up Fall Flat |
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
The Catholic Church stands in the way of such control...
Things such as forcing abortion and euthanasia down people's throats.
here. here!
Yes, there is a campaign against the Catholic Church and especially Pope Benedictus, since he is acting against the left wing of the Church.
AFAIK Freemasons from the Great Orient of France clearly support a laicist vision in which the State, their State, is put in place of God. However, in my country, Spain, they are splitted, and some do but others don’t.
I am glad the Freemasons in your country is split. That will help to keep them from attacking the church effectively...
Somebody clear this up for me, do the Freemansons or the Jews control the world? /sarc
As I have stated before. The real reason for this is that other Church’s are accepting homosexuals and women as though their acts were perfectly normal and allright.
The catholic Church does not accept them as norma; and has no intention of making women Priests. This is what is bringning down the wrath of the Liberal and intellectuals who accept any aberration as normal.
The Freemasons do not control the world. But they are DUPES of the power brokers.
For example, in the late 1700's or early 1800's, the Rothchild family had their own Masonic lodge.
A freemason is obligated to help a brother freemason in trouble. That is part of being a freemason.
All a power broker has to do is put a freemason (aka Bill or Hillary Clinton) in a position of power, and then pull their strings.
The George H. W. Bush was involved in secret societies.
The only two modern presidents that I am aware of that were not Freemasons were Reagan and Kennedy.
Kennedy was good that he was a fiscal conservative but a liberal on social issues. He also "bucked" his father more than once in his life.
Pope Has Immunity In Abuse Trials: Vatican
The Dictatorship of Relativism Strikes Backand Goes Nuclear
New York Daily News Urges Fairness for the Pope
Brooklyn Bishop: Catholic Church Won't be NYT's 'Personal Punching Bag'
holding the New York Times accountable
Cardinal Levada to NY Times: Reconsider 'Attack Mode' Against Pope Benedict
Clearing Benedict's Good Name: The New York Times Must Retract Its False Reporting
Game Over: Benedict 1. MSM 0.
Milwaukee WI Archbishop defends Pope Benedict
[Milwaukee] Archbishop Listecki Apologizes For Priest's Sex Abuse
Defending the Pope against Hot Air
Catholic Caucus: Accusations that Pope Complicit in Abuse Cover-Up Fall Flat
Setting the record straight in the case of abusive Milwaukee priest Father Lawrence Murphy
Former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland Admits He's Gay
Long Applause for New York Prelate Who Defends Pope
NYT UNFAIRLY CITES POPE'S ROLE [Catholic Caucus]
Scoundrel Time(s)
The Pope and the Murphy case: what the New York Times story didn't tell you
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.