Replies

Cannon 1341 states that the bishop is to ‘‘start a judicial administrative procedure, for the imposition or the declaration of penalties, only when he perceives that neither by fraternal correction nor reproof, nor by any methods of pastoral care, can the scandal be sufficiently repaired, justice restored, and the offender reformed’’.

I looked up Cannon 1341 on Google. This is the first page of results:

http://www.i4es.org/resumes/KFucikResume.pdf

http://www.lawyersdirections.com/oregon/cannon-beach/619334-101-press-inc.html

http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Sep-2003/0155.html

http://www.stateoforegon.com/directory.php?name=&city=Cannon+Beach&form=biz

http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2008/pr0811_01d.pdf

http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-religion/2411895/posts(link to this thread)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canon_EOS_3_img_1341.jpg

http://openjurist.org/280/f3d/1341

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1341 (an article about the year 1341).

Sorry, Alex. I can't find any references to Cannon 1341 that back up your claim. Do you have any more?

Sorry, Alex. I can't find any references to Cannon 1341 that back up your claim.

Sorry Mark, but it wasn't my claim. Still, somehow I was able to find the exact quote at the "Our Lady's Warriors" webpage. Here's the quote from the thread:

‘‘start a judicial administrative procedure, for the imposition or the declaration of penalties, only when he perceives that neither by fraternal correction nor reproof, nor by any methods of pastoral care, can the scandal be sufficiently repaired, justice restored, and the offender reformed’’.

And here's the quote from Our Lady's Warriors [matching sections are bolded]:

TITLE V: THE APPLICATION OF PENALTIES
Can. 1341 The Ordinary is to start a judicial or an administrative procedure for the imposition or the declaration of penalties only when he perceives that neither by fraternal correction or reproof, nor by any methods of pastoral care, can the scandal be sufficiently repaired, justice restored and the offender reformed.

Perhaps your search was thrown by the misspelling of the word "canon" in the article.

I suspect it might be the 1917 Code, which preceded the one currently in force. The canon numbers, and subject order, would be different.

Still, it’s pretty cheesy stuff for you to be bringing up, Alex. Got any of this stuff highlighting Protestant ministers? How about public school teachers? No? Somehow, I didn’t think so, though that stuff is certainly not at all hard to find on the web.

Well maybe you have to spell it correctly...3rd one down...1st page...

http://books.google.com/books?id=JKgZEjvB5cEC&pg=PA1558&lpg=PA1558&dq=Canon+1341&source=bl&ots=GI7HLJxz-f&sig=N7pmFl3-k654-T4sEwe50oOpVWI&hl=en&ei=LiUvS7_lAoaKNuHBtY4J&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Canon%201341&f=false

I looked up Cannon 1341 on Google. This is the first page of results: ... Sorry, Alex. I can't find any references to Cannon 1341 that back up your claim. Do you have any more?

I have to say this is a hilarious epic Google search FAIL and completely your fault! Everything is easy to find on Google if you know how to search — try this again, search for "Canon 1341" but INCLUDE the quotation marks, and spell Canon correctly this time.

Code of Cannon Law? Is that indexed by ordnance?

Sorry guy, couldn't resist.