Posted on 12/10/2009 9:47:56 AM PST by NYer
The whole “can’t fly faster than the speed of light THEREFORE...” argument is lame.
A hundred years ago, if someone in NY said they were going to be in London in four hours, they woulda locked him up and thrown away the key.
And I personally am convinced there is alien life (maybe not highly advanced alien life, but alien life nonetheless) right in our backyard - our martian backyard, that is.
I liked Leigh Brackett’s Mars and Venus better.
“That God created another world than this one, and that in its time many other men and women existed and that consequently Adam was not the first man.” (Condemned Errors of Zanini de Solicia, Denzginer 717c)
That’s really the crux of the matter isn’t it? The hypostatic union of the human and divine natures of Christ in the Incarnation make it quite impossible for Him to have saved the space aliens in Adromeda in the same manner, since He did so to save us, not the Andromedans. So they would have to be perfect and without original sin.
The whole message of the Bible revolves around the centrality of the Earth in the care of God, the centrality of man on the Earth.
Since teleportation would seperate the body from the soul, how would it do anything but turn you into a corpse in another location?
The only stuff I have read from L. Brackett has been a few short stories in anthologies. But I like “Rio Bravo” and “The Empire Strikes Back” I’ll have to check her out better.
All I know is that Tars Tarkis rules and Frazetta paints a mean Dejah Thoris.
Freegards, may your thoat never stumble in battle
“Since teleportation would seperate the body from the soul, how would it do anything but turn you into a corpse in another location?”
I’m not sure why you think that would happen, “seperating the body from the soul”. I don’t reckon such a thing could be undone by mere science. Am I missing something?
I don’t see why God would bar scientific teleportation when so many Saints have bilocated. If that’s how we are meant to eventually get around, then fine. If not, fine. I’ll follow the Church teaching on the matter.
What if you only sent things without souls? Like robots?
Freegards
He's got same basic problems here. There's no reason to assume life has to be in a different galaxy. There are plenty of stars and planets right here in this one. So the rest of his point makes no sense.
to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.
Through the resurrection of Christ, everyone will be resurrected and become immortal. Through the atonement of Christ, everyone who believes and accepts Christ and follows His laws and ordinances will receive eternal life.
If you're looking for an alien woman, there's quite a few in Russia who are looking for a meal ticket...
All I’d be good for in a battle is yelling, anyway.
Agreed, so where does this address any life forms that are not-man or of extra-terrestrial flavor?
It doesn’t. Not saying there is, or is not ET life; not saying that God did or did not Create there also, just that He did not address it in the Bible and that it is presumptuous to say, outside of what He tells us, that we know His ‘motivations’ in reagards to it.
Teleportation, as I understand it, consists of turning the human body into a stream of information/energy that would describe the precise state of every atom and sub-atomic particle, then beaming that information to some other location and reconstituting a body from it.
Since there would be no movement of actual matter from one location to another, I can’t see how the soul would be moved from what is literally one body into a new one. Its rather like the Greek speculative philsophy question of if you take a wood ship, and then replace every board that makes up the ship, is it still the same ship you started with, or is it a new one?
This is an interesting philosophical question though.
Hmm. I guess maybe it would depend on if the same body (atoms, molecules)was re-constructed if that method of travel was used. I can’t see the Church declairing the body who was reconstructed souless, however, but they might ban the use of such transportaion due to the initial transformation of the body. Maybe they would say it has a different soul. Perhaps if people always arrived dead but animals always survived that would be evidence that the process was divorcing the body from the soul? The problem in any case is you are still beaming it, so it is still going to take a while to get any where on a galactic scale. I’m not sure it would even qualify as “teleportation” as you are still moving through space, albeit at close to the speed of light as some type of beam of particles, sorta like the transporters from Star Trek.
I guess by teleportation I meant just shifting objects in space without moving. Or the worm-hole thing, where a short cut through space is created connecting to distant places, where you step through and appear somewhere else.
It is indeed interesting to think about!!
Freegards
Its not so much the Church declaring a body reconstrcuted to be soulless, but rather recognizing the danger that upon arrival, you might have simply been turned into a corpse because your soul did not travel with you, having been seperated from the body during the process of destroying the body and turning it into information and energy.
Its certainly not something I'd want to risk being the guinea pig on.
connecting to distant places
But what if the Earth is in a special place in the universe (i.e. the solution of the Earth being in a low density void to the dark matter/dark energy problem that eliminates the need for dark matter/dark energy), and it turns out there are no distant places? We understand so little of the universe due to apparent scale and our own limitations that being involved in such experiments would make me very hesitant.
I don’t think what you are describing is pure teleportation. The beam is still moving through space, right? Basically you are just cutting the cost and complication of having a spaceship carrying things. And it would still be “slow” in that the beam is going close to the speed of light, or does the beam go faster than light?
Like I said, if animals(no soul) can do it but people(soul) arrive dead that might be attributed to divorcing the soul from the body. Or God could allow the soul to travel with the beam.
It is true we know little about the Universe. We don’t even know if our constant, reliable rules of nature apply everywhere in it or not. It could be that at some point before they would become galacticly visible to our crude instruments all intelligent life does some experiment that completely destroys them, and that is why we haven’t seen anyone else so far.
Freegards
Animals have souls. They are living beings too. Their souls simply are not immortal, and do not allow intentional action.
Everything that is alive has a soul, otherwise, we'd have a case of matter in self-motion. Matter does not move on its own (Newton's First Law), but must have motion imparted to it by an outside actor. In the case of living things, this outside actor is God, who imparts life and motion via the joining of the soul (anima - the animating principal of living things) to the body (otherwise inert matter).
I see. So if that form of teleportation did divorce the soul from the body, plants, animals and people would all arrive dead. I reckon you could still send robots this way to do your exploring.
Like I said I think maybe the ‘beaming’ form of travel isn’t true teleportation, because the beam still has to travel through space.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.