Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mulekites (MORMON) (OPEN)
Ensign Magazine ^ | March 1987 | Garth A. Wilson

Posted on 07/11/2009 1:06:54 PM PDT by greyfoxx39

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Disclaimer: I am former LDS and "anti" mormonism. I post articles from official mormon sources that often relate to current discussions taking place on the forum to provide a means for open discussion in the Religion forum.
 
FROM THE RELIGION FORUM MODERATOR:

Open threads are a town square. Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs of any kind. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule.

On all threads, but particularly “open” threads, posters must never “make it personal.” Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.” Making a thread “about” another Freeper is “making it personal.”

When in doubt, review your use of the pronoun “you” before hitting “enter.”

Like the Smoky Backroom, the conversation may be offensive to some.

Thin-skinned posters will be booted from “open” threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters.

http://www.freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/

 Thin-skinned (emotional, whiney or mercurial temper) posters are the disruptors on open threads.

 

1 posted on 07/11/2009 1:06:54 PM PDT by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/11/2009 1:09:20 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

The Mulekites
________________________________________

Donkeys with kites ???

Or donkeys are kites ???

Either way...this I gotta see

;)


3 posted on 07/11/2009 1:11:35 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I’m curious as to how the Jews take this article...know any FR Jewish folks you can ping?


4 posted on 07/11/2009 1:15:05 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Mormons need to hope that God has a really good sense of humor...


5 posted on 07/11/2009 1:17:48 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Ain’t that the truth?


6 posted on 07/11/2009 1:19:57 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

PING


7 posted on 07/11/2009 1:27:08 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

A serious reader?

To me that phrase seems a tad ironic concerning this material.


8 posted on 07/11/2009 1:56:55 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Well, THEY'RE serious about it!

Mulekites

9 posted on 07/11/2009 2:03:48 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

One reason that readers of the Book of Mormon get confused about the Mulekites is that the name Mulekite is never used.
_________________________________________

That’s cause in 1805 the mormon gods changed their minds and called them “MuleHeadeds”

The firstborn of that new generation of Muleheaded was visited by two personages the year, 1820, and told to read the rocks in his hat...

Joey Smith thought that they meant his Pet Rocks...

But alas, the mormon gods meant the ones in his MuleHead..


10 posted on 07/11/2009 2:29:03 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I didn’t know that the Mulekites looked like The Reverend Jesse Jackson: http://www.mormonapologetics.org/lofiversion/index.php/t40472.html

This dude looks too solid to fly.


11 posted on 07/11/2009 3:21:15 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
And who was this Mulek? According The Maxwell Institute, a wholly owned subsidiary of BYU, he probably is the same as the Malchijah or Machiyah of Jeremiah 38:6.
After arguing that “son of the king” could mean only a “royal personage” the authors say because of context here it here it meant literally “son” although Jeremiah 39:6 says all of Zedekiah's “sons and noblemen” were killed before Zedekiah before he was blinded.

How does Machiyah become Mulek? With a simple slash key.

“So was Mulek the “Malkiyahu the son of the king” mentioned in Jeremiah 38:6? Nothing in the Bible or the Book of Mormon negates this identification.

And the evidence rehearsed above lends significant support to it. The m-l-k basis of both Hebrew names is clear, and the case of Berekhyahu/Baruch demonstrates that there is theoretical precedent for a person being called both Malkiyahu and Mulek—the one a longer, more formal version of the name with a theophoric yahu element, and the other a shorter form lacking that element but featuring a different vowel vocalization.”

If you want to see more of the leaps from speculation to assumed fact, go to mi.byu.edu/display.php?table=jbms&id=324

12 posted on 07/11/2009 3:22:13 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

LOL...he DOES look like old Jesse.


13 posted on 07/11/2009 3:24:15 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Great...

Another civilization that “exists” somewhere that they will “find” all over the globe...

14 posted on 07/11/2009 3:25:47 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

I love all the antiquities theft the LDS “scientist” do...


15 posted on 07/11/2009 3:29:46 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

***LOL...he DOES look like old Jesse.***

He would do quite well in the LDS, I suspect. His oration surpasses theirs and he is not unacquainted with fantastic theology. Plus, he is an excellent shakedown artist - witness two of his sons getting Coca Cola distribution franchises gratis.


16 posted on 07/11/2009 4:35:47 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

***I love all the antiquities theft the LDS “scientist” do...***

I wonder how many of them will wind up in the museum housing the Urim and Thummims and the golden tablets.


17 posted on 07/11/2009 4:37:53 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Just think of the perks he could get for being other than "white and delightsome"!

He could be front and center at all the General Conferences.

18 posted on 07/11/2009 5:05:21 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
although Jeremiah 39:6 says all of Zedekiah's “sons and noblemen” were killed before Zedekiah before he was blinded.

Just a minor glitch...later revelation takes care of that little detail.

19 posted on 07/11/2009 5:07:12 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Please God, deliver us from the deprivations of the Obamonster, and do it SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

***Just think of the perks he could get for being other than “white and delightsome”!

He could be front and center at all the General Conferences.***

You bet. They could put him in a glass cage and get him running around a little wheel. That would serve two purposes. First, it would show the world that the LDS do indeed regard blacks as able to enter their buildings. Secondly, it would shield at the white and delightsome from actually being in the same physical area as a black man.

Can’t get too close to those whom the LDS God has cursed with a black skin, you know. Icky.


20 posted on 07/11/2009 5:16:04 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson