Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Bishop Eulogizes First President (Short and Powerful)
irishcatholichumanist.blogspot.com ^ | Monday, February 16, 2009 | Pat McNamara

Posted on 02/16/2009 9:37:41 AM PST by GonzoII

In 1789, America got its first President, George Washington, and its first R.C, Bishop, John Carroll. At the time of the former’s death in 1799, Bishop Caroll gave the following eulogy on the Founding Father’s passing:

(Excerpt) Read more at irishcatholichumanist.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bishops; catholic; georgewashington; presidents; presidentsday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
 Who is like unto God?
1 posted on 02/16/2009 9:37:41 AM PST by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Salvation; NYer

Ping.


2 posted on 02/16/2009 9:38:12 AM PST by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

If only Americans could return to what Bishop Carroll said.


3 posted on 02/16/2009 9:44:03 AM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I found a story once that George Washington died a Catholic. Anyone?


4 posted on 02/16/2009 9:49:02 AM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Everyone dies a Catholic. ;^)


5 posted on 02/16/2009 9:51:57 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Beautiful. And succinct.


6 posted on 02/16/2009 9:53:25 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

There is no evidence to support this, but the rumour does date back to the 19th century.


7 posted on 02/16/2009 9:58:12 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

“May these United States flourish in pure and undefiled religion, in morality, peace, union, liberty, and the enjoyment of their excellent Constitution, as long as respect, honor, and veneration shall gather around the name of Washington; that is, whilst there still shall be any surviving record of human events!”
___________________________________________________

Yes, well, there are those who are busy euthanizing the record of human events...


8 posted on 02/16/2009 10:00:20 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Don’t think so. I think the Jesuits say he venerated Mary to some degree. But never heard that he died a Catholic. That’s not to say his thinking wasn’t Catholic in character.


9 posted on 02/16/2009 10:00:26 AM PST by jackofhearts (Unko bachana kaun chahega (Who will want to save them)??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

He was Anglican, so he was a “catholic” but not “Roman Catholic.”


10 posted on 02/16/2009 10:05:31 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

Washington was a committed Freemason, which does not object to Roman Catholism, but RC objects to Freemasons, so I would strongly doubt it.

As an aside, after the revolution, Washington would leave prior to communion in Church. Enquiries were made, and the explanation was essentially that he could not forgive someone for something, so he deemed himself unfit for Communion.


11 posted on 02/16/2009 10:08:20 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
RC objects to Freemasons

You're out of date on that. RC's are now allowed to belong to masonic lodges.

12 posted on 02/16/2009 10:40:19 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Cool beans. I did not know that.

This makes sense, as the differences were historical/mutual misunderstandings.


13 posted on 02/16/2009 10:45:49 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

>> You’re out of date on that. RC’s are now allowed to belong to masonic lodges. <<

No, it’s just some have become inattentive.

Frankly, I think it’s downright disingenuous to say RC objects to Freemasonry but Freemasonry doesn’t object to RC. I’d say that Freemasonry is subersive to Catholicism, and therefore, Catholicism excludes Freemasonry to prevent that subversion.


14 posted on 02/16/2009 10:50:10 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I doubt it.

If he had done so, he would have been buried as a Roman Catholic, which he was not.

The Rev. Thomas David, rector of Christ Church, Alexandria VA, John Addison, St John’s Broad Creek, MD and 2 other Anglican clergy officiated over the service which was conducted according to the prayerbook of the Episcopal Church.

Martha Washington asked the members of her husband’s Masonic Lodge to conduct Masonic rites at the funeral. Of the six pallbearers all but one were masons. Colonel Philip Marstellerwas the lone non-Mason to be a pall bearer.


15 posted on 02/16/2009 10:50:26 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I’m Anglican and I have a Marian icon and a small statue.


16 posted on 02/16/2009 10:51:37 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I have never heard that he was unforgiving toward anyone, do you have a source?

I have read that he was low church and was not accustomed to frequent communion. The Bishop of Philadelphia who took him to task for leaving early was high church and celebrated communion more fequently.
In Philadelphia, when he was president, George escorted Martha to services but he would leave after morning prayer before communion, Martha would remain to receive. The Bishop took exception to this becasue when George left, many of the other worshippers followed. After being chastized George continued to escort Martha to church but waited on her outside in their carriage.

An interesting study of colonial Anglicanism in VA is A Blessed Company by John Kendall Nelson.


17 posted on 02/16/2009 11:00:25 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kalee

” have never heard that he was unforgiving toward anyone, do you have a source?”

It was a biography I read long ago, so no, not really.


18 posted on 02/16/2009 11:01:53 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dangus

“I’d say that Freemasonry is subersive to Catholicism, and therefore, Catholicism excludes Freemasonry to prevent that subversion.”

That’s just not true (in the USA, anyway).

To the extent it dealt with religion (which, despite the rumors to the contrary, it does not) the fraternity is decidedly non-denominational, which forms the core of the issue, as it conflicts with the RC belief that it, alone, is the valid Christian church.


19 posted on 02/16/2009 11:04:52 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk; MeanWestTexan
"You're out of date on that. RC's are now allowed to belong to masonic lodges."

No, we still get the boot; Roman Catholics are still excommunicated for becoming Freemasons:

The Church has imposed the penalty of excommunication on Catholics who become Freemasons. The penalty of excommunication for joining the Masonic Lodge was explicit in the 1917 code of canon law (canon 2335), and it is implicit in the 1983 code (canon 1374).

Because the revised code of canon law is not explicit on this point, some drew the mistaken conclusion that the Church's prohibition of Freemasonry had been dropped. As a result of this confusion, shortly before the 1983 code was promulgated, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a statement indicating that the penalty was still in force. This statement was dated November 26, 1983 and may be found in <Origins> 13/27 (Nov. 15, 1983), 450.


Copyright (c) 1993 Catholic Answers. Reprinted with permission from the June 1993 issue of <This Rock> magazine.


Provided Courtesy of:
Eternal Word Television Network
5817 Old Leeds Road
Irondale, AL 35210


20 posted on 02/16/2009 11:05:26 AM PST by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson