[js1138]

Forget that ToE is an unproven theory when applied to inter-species

If DNA cannot be used to determine kinship, there are a lot of court decisions that need to be reversed.

[DBCJR]

Yes, OJ Simpson started that process as I recall.

[TXnMA]

Forget that ToE is an unproven theory when applied to inter-species

~~~~~~~~~~~

"If DNA cannot be used to determine kinship, there are a lot of court decisions that need to be reversed."

Thank you for so clearly illustrating the depth of abject self-imposed ignorance that pervades (nay, characterizes) the so-called "thinking" of your anti-science ilk!

1. FYI, "inter-species" means between species.

2. OTOH, use of the DNA as you cite is intRA (within)-species. (More specifically, it is done intra-kin-group or intra-family -- or intra (between) individual specimens of the species....)

Until you at least learn to make such rudimentary discrimination, please cease from embarrassing the rest of us believers with your knee-jerk displays of refusal to learn...

[CottShop]

[[If DNA cannot be used to determine kinship, there are a lot of court decisions that need to be reversed.]]

you’ve made this statement several times in several threads- DNA comparison for court cases has absolutely no relevence to Genetic change that supposedly happeend in species- Common design accounts for similarities, however it does not need to ifner relatedness. Genetic comparisons in cases of relations shows FAR more similarities than does say even a man and ape comparison.

[metmom]

Forget that ToE is an unproven theory when applied to inter-species

If DNA cannot be used to determine kinship, there are a lot of court decisions that need to be reversed.

WOW! Going off topic at the speed of light.

There's a world of difference between demonstrating inter-species relationships and kinship as is used in a court of law.

Even if DNA can be used to determine relationships, it does not prove common descent.