Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona Bishops Encourage Yes Vote in Support of Proposition 102, the Marriage Amendment
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix ^ | September 4, 2008)

Posted on 09/28/2008 6:40:07 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler

PHOENIX (September 4, 2008) The Bishops of the Catholic Conference of Arizona, in a pastoral statement released today, are encouraging voters to vote yes this November 4 on Proposition 102, which would amend the Arizona Constitution by providing a legal definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

The Most Rev. Thomas J. Olmsted, Bishop of Phoenix and Apostolic Administrator of Gallup, and the Most Rev. Gerald F. Kicanas, Bishop of Tucson, support Proposition 102 and are asking the support of Catholics in their respective dioceses. The proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution that is promoted in Proposition 102 simply states, “Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.”

“Our support is based upon our Church’s teaching on the sanctity of marriage as a faithful, exclusive, lifelong union of a man and a woman joined in an intimate community of life and love,” the bishops say in their statement. “We believe Proposition 102 is in alignment with our deeply held moral beliefs regarding marriage.”

The full text of the pastoral statement from the Arizona Catholic Conference Bishops is available at www.azcatholicconference.org


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; bishop; olmstead; phoenix
Here is the video that was played at mass last Sunday: Video.
1 posted on 09/28/2008 6:40:08 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Arizona already voted this down two years ago, why do the bishops think they’re going to be any more effective this time?


2 posted on 09/28/2008 6:42:19 PM PDT by hunter112 (Gov. Palin is ten times the woman Hillary could've hoped to be, if she had stayed a "Goldwater Girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

This time Bishop Olmstead is speaking up and loudly.


3 posted on 09/28/2008 6:47:26 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Looks like I squandered my 401K just in time. Who's the fool now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Let's talk about it, Ellen Degenerate. It's only natural?
4 posted on 09/28/2008 6:49:50 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

2 years ago a contributing factor to it’s downfall was benefits wouldn’t be given to domestic partners and that stuff, this time around, however, it only defines marriage as that between a man and a woman.
Once I get my mail in ballot I’m voting for this.


5 posted on 09/28/2008 7:00:55 PM PDT by Vaak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I wish the California bishops would come out and do the same for our marriage amendment - Prop 8.

... and Prop 4 - Sarah’s Law — parental notification.


6 posted on 09/28/2008 7:47:26 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson