>> Dangus, you’ve got your own agenda and you can’t support it. In fact, you’re now becoming ridiculous. <<
And what would that agenda be? Mind-reading and name-calling so soon? The funny thing is that post was inspired by me citing Galatians 2 in another post that Cephas was Peter. In doing so, I bumped into the assertion that he wasn’t. I was intrigued by something that contradicted my assertion, so I shared it with everyone.
What’s funny is that even though I explain how this notion is irrelevant to Catholic doctrine, and even post the refutations to this argument in the original post (which I found relatively persuasive), I get attacked for having an agenda.
Attacked? What, then, is the purpose of the post? If ant?