While certainly interesting this is really not surprising. We've known for a long time that the Bible's historical narrative has been accurate from the Divided Kingdom (i.e. post-Solomonic) period forward. The problem is there is no extra-Biblical corroboration of the account prior to this period. In other words, no evidence outside the Bible supporting the account from Solomon on back. This is a problem for those who say that archeology proves the Bible.
The absence of proof is not proof. I trust God and His word.
The existence of Troy (a fact) doesn't prove the Trojan war (a legend). In other words, prose can employ real names and real characters in a fictional story.