Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana

But don’t you think it a bit odd that a Muslim could be in the line of succession, or a Hindu, or a Buddhist, but not a Catholic?


9 posted on 05/03/2008 6:48:43 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
But don’t you think it a bit odd that a Muslim could be in the line of succession, or a Hindu, or a Buddhist, but not a Catholic?

That's exactly right. That law in England dating back to 1701 does not require a member of the royal family in the line of succession to be an Anglican -- it prohibits them from being a Catholic.

It seems to me that a nation where Osama bin Laden could be king -- but any Catholic cannot -- isn't long for this world.

17 posted on 05/03/2008 7:10:25 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts

The king or queen of England is always a Protestant, an Anglican


22 posted on 05/03/2008 7:23:51 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson