Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the "Reformation" reform?
03-23-2008 | count-yor-change

Posted on 03/23/2008 1:40:54 PM PDT by count-your-change

What most needed reforming was left in place, the clergy and the laity as two distinct classes.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: clergy; laity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Martin Luther certainly had reason for his list of complaints but the division of the Christian congregation into a clergy class and a laity class was one of the most glaring of departures from the Scriptures and his efforts at reform left it solidly fixed. Jesus had Himself admonished His disciples at Matt. 23:8-12 that they were not to take titles for themselves and seek attention by their dress. And it seems that as long as the apostles were alive they could keep such practices out of the various congregations but as Paul said to the elders from Ephesus at Acts 20:20-31 after he went away men would arise "from your own group" to lead off disciples after themselves. Secular history records that those were who were supposed to be servants in the Christian church instead became a powerful elite with special garb and titles to set them above a "laity". As a Jesuit writer said in his article, "Beyond the Clergy-Laity Divide", "..there really was no clergy-laity divide during the patristic period". (1) Paul C. Phan, a professor at The Catholic University in Washington, D.C. , made a similar comment in an essay titled, "The Laity in the Early Church-Building Blocks for a Theology of the Laity" (2) Indeed, The Catholic Encyclopedia states that before the time of Constantine the priestly dress didn't differ from secular dress and that everyday dress was worn at the offices of the church. (3) The division of worshipers into a professional, paid, titled clergy and a laity class continued to be the form after the "Reformation". This division was unscriptural then and it is now. (1) http://www.sedos.org/english/kunnumpuram.html (2) http://www.members.cox.net/vientritdao/bao/cho4.html (3) http://www.newaadvent.org/cathen/15388a.html
1 posted on 03/23/2008 1:40:54 PM PDT by count-your-change
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

ib4z, on about a 40% chance.


2 posted on 03/23/2008 1:55:02 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Free New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

IBTZ? Paragraphs are one’s friends ...


3 posted on 03/23/2008 2:00:56 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Everything is either willed or permitted by God, and nothing can hurt me." Bl. Charles de Foucauld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Very interesting.


4 posted on 03/23/2008 2:06:11 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

So the Mormons are actually more “early Christian” than either Catholics or Protestants?


5 posted on 03/23/2008 2:10:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

So far, all responses have ignored what is said, and have ignored or made snide remarks without any reference to what you posted.

Your post has a lot of merit to it. Of course, it could be expanded into many, many pages that would just touch on the problems of a clergy-laity mentality. The Apostles were against dividing Christians by elevating one man against another. Then, naturally, philosophy played a large part in trying to downplay the words and teachings of the Apostles in this respect.


6 posted on 03/23/2008 2:27:25 PM PDT by Truth Defender (History teaches, if we but listen to it; but no one really listens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth Defender

True. Since anyone able to read out there has as much access to research material as I do I am somewhat reluctant to do for others what is really their personal responsibility-to do as Paul said at 1 Thes. 5:21.


7 posted on 03/23/2008 2:41:20 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I know but my secretary has been off work for the past 37 years.


8 posted on 03/23/2008 2:43:23 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not familiar enough with Morman practice and doctrine to answer. If you are, tell me about it. thanks.


9 posted on 03/23/2008 2:46:46 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
True. Since anyone able to read out there has as much access to research material as I do I am somewhat reluctant to do for others what is really their personal responsibility-to do as Paul said at 1 Thes. 5:21.

You are absolutely right. However, people are generally too lazy to investigate WHY they believe WHAT they believe. They would rather just make unjustified remarks that seek to confound any issue raised. There is a bad side to using the internet to find information for the greatest amount of it is based upon bias and philosophy - the ideas of men versus what is taught in Scritures.

I Thess. 5:21 speaks of "times and seasons," not of doing research. However, in Act 17:11 we do find a verse that is pertinent, as I'm somewhat sure you would agree. It is always more noble, to use Paul's word, to do the research yourself to see if what is said is true - which does, in a way, make it incumbant upon individuals to do their own investigating.

10 posted on 03/23/2008 3:07:09 PM PDT by Truth Defender (History teaches, if we but listen to it; but no one really listens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

The reason such a system flourishes is because it is so well suited to the people it displaces. The laity are glad to give up their responsibility to anyone who will take it.


11 posted on 03/23/2008 3:07:54 PM PDT by Seven_0 (You cannot fool all of the people, ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo

No kidding? Ah, well.


13 posted on 03/23/2008 3:16:34 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
The investigation was about his articles or comments on the relationship between Christianity and other religions. The comments I pointed out were not in question and never have been. He was not offering opinion on the particular point I cited. Not everything he said there was pertinent to my discussion nor are his opinions on other subjects.
14 posted on 03/23/2008 3:19:26 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Martin Luther and his effect on Hitler - might want to read this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1986216/posts


15 posted on 03/23/2008 3:19:52 PM PDT by GOPJ (Remember your ABC's -- Anybody But Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Truth Defender

Are we both reading the same verse? As i read 1 Thessalonians 5:21 it speaks of “test everything hold fast to what is good”.
The internet is a ocean and there’s poisonous things in it as well healthful. One just has to very careful about what they swallow. True of my local library also which has a patina of authority for its contents as the internet does not.
Yes, the Beroeans were noble minded for doing the examination the Thessalonians were told to do.


17 posted on 03/23/2008 3:35:35 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

I didn’t ignore his other comments nor did rely on him alone. If he is wrong about the point I cited him for does it make any difference about anything else he has said? No? If he is right does it make any difference? No.
But he is not object of concern here is he?


18 posted on 03/23/2008 3:46:20 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

That might be something for another day. thanks


19 posted on 03/23/2008 3:49:14 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
They missed all the Pagan feasts like Easter and Christmas and Sunday

20 posted on 03/23/2008 3:50:17 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson