Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

So, it is correct to refer to “natural family planning” as “birth control” then?


10 posted on 08/24/2007 9:06:30 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib
So, it is correct to refer to “natural family planning” as “birth control” then?

Of course. In fact, properly speaking, NFP is the only true form of birth control, because it allows for birth and requires control. It is not, however, artificial contraception, in that, it does not actively work against conception in an artificial manner. That's the moral difference between then two for Catholics.

14 posted on 08/24/2007 10:12:26 AM PDT by mockingbyrd (peace begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLib

Yes, NFP is birth control, inasmuch as it is a way to either postpone or achieve pregnancy through knowledgeable COOPERATION WITH natural fertility patterns. But it is not contraception, which means acting AGAINST natural fertility patterns.

There are some non-Catholics out there, including the crunchy-granola subset of feminists, who like NFP because it does not pathologize the normal functioning of female physiology, nor treat a fertile female as if she were diseased.


16 posted on 08/24/2007 11:08:03 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (God bless the child who's got his own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson