>> The list you are showing has those who have reached the age. If I am not mistaken, there are several Dioceses that are still open and the Holy Father received a request for removal due to poor health only last week <<
There are seven vacant sees, but none of them are archdioceses.
>> I have the impression that the outgoing (Arch)Bishop has had significant input into his successor. <<
I would think it only natural that the evaluation of subordinates by outgoing bishops has strong influence on the recommendations of the nuncio.
>> Who is engineering that is not known to me, but it could be the man in Philadelphia [Regali!] since Raleigh was one of his. <<
From Regali to Raleigh? LOL! Yes, I believe Regali is a good assistant in identifying solid bishops.
>> It has been speculated that several Archdioceses that were historically Cardinatial Sees may not be so anymore. The absence of a Cardinal from Texas, for example, is glaring with its huge Catholic population. <<
I can’t see Baltimore, the mother diocese of the USA, being denied a Cardinal, nor New York, even though it is very small since Washington to its own Cardinatial see. I can’t see Washington losing one since it was just established in the last few decades; if it did, it would be taken as a sharp rebuke to Paul VI. The other five “Cardinatial Sees” are the five largest archdioceses in the nation. The next biggest is Newark, a shrinking diocese literally overshadowed by New York.
Maybe someday, Houston-Galveston will be, but it was only recently elevated to archdiocese, is still smaller than the dioceses of Brooklyn, Rockville Center and Orange, has very inconsequential suffragan dioceses, and oversees a very modest number of parishes (150). Texas isn’t all that Catholic; about 5 million out of 20 million Texan residents are Catholic. There’s 65 million Catholics in America.
That’s what I get for reading Rocco Palma! He has San Antonio as perhaps the next Cardinatial See.
;-o)