Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philadelphia 11 appeal free speech limits [Christians have no right to speak at public event]
WorldNet Daily ^ | February 16, 2007

Posted on 02/16/2007 6:43:53 AM PST by Alex Murphy

A notice of appeal has been filed with the 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals over actions by city officials in Philadephia who not only refused to protect the speech rights of 11 Christians at a public homosexual festival, but arrested them for quoting the Bible and speaking against the behavior.

The Alliance Defense Fund said it is appealing a judge's Jan. 19 dismissal of the group's federal court lawsuit against the city officials.

"Speech cannot be silenced simply because another person or group does not agree with it," said Ted Hoppe, an attorney allied with the ADF. "City officials must be held accountable for their decision to violate the First Amendment rights of Christians who wanted nothing more than to engage in peaceful assembly on a public street."

Members of the "Philadelphia 11" as the group has become known were arrested Oct. 10, 2004, after quoting the Bible and expressing their views against homosexual behavior on a public street during "OutFest," a publicly funded celebration of homosexual choices.

They were jailed overnight in the case, but a judge later dismissed any criminal counts as having no basis in fact. The individuals then filed the damage lawsuit against the city.

"City officials must be held accountable for their decision to censor those who disagree with homosexual behavior," Hoppe said. "All citizens are permitted by the Constitution to express their beliefs on a public street during a publicly funded event without fear of arrest."

As WND has just reported, one of the members of the Philadelphia 11 is Repent America director Michael Marcavage, who said the precedent set by the dismissal would allow police to arrest anyone at any public gathering simply because they would have what the judge calls "a contrary message."

U.S. District Judge Lawrence Stengel had concluded in dismissing the civil rights claim that a "permit" granted by the city to the homosexuals allowed police to silence the Christian activists' message on public streets.

"It is without question that Judge Stengel's decision has set a precedent to eliminate the First Amendment rights of others by citing that a 'permitting scheme' can be used by police and event organizers to 'exclude persons expressing contrary messages' in public areas and at public events," Marcavage said.

Rev. Ted Pike, of the National Prayer Network, said the dismissal of the civil rights complaint means that "the Philly 11 were wrong in exercising free speech in what had become a no-free speech zone."

He said the federal plan "would eventually allow government 'thought police' to push aside states' rights in law enforcement. Such laws would allow federal indictment of Christian 'haters' in every state of the Union…"

"It would become a federal crime … to show bias against protected groups [including] homosexuals. However, deviant groups such as witches, Satanists, pedophiles, abortionists, and even 'sinners' could quickly catch a ride on the bandwagon of federal protection from the 'hate' of biblically oriented criticism," he said.

The decision by Stengel granted summary judgment to the city of Philadelphia and "Philly Pride Presents, Inc."

The judge couldn't escape the facts that "the activity in question took place in a public forum," and "there is no doubt that the venue for OutFest, a designated section of streets and sidewalks of Philadelphia, was a public place," but despite that he found that through the permit OutFest "was empowered to enforce the permit by excluding persons expressing contrary messages."


TOPICS: Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: aclumia; activistcourt; alamia; antichristian; atheismandstate; censorship; firstamendment; gaystapotactics; homosexualagenda; thoughcrime; thoughtcrime

1 posted on 02/16/2007 6:43:56 AM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

In the END TIMES . . . . great lawlessness . . .

now, protected lawlessness.

I wonder how many judges have had to pass the global government puppet master vetting before being empowered?


2 posted on 02/16/2007 7:07:11 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

First Amendment - R.I.P.


3 posted on 02/16/2007 7:24:58 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Tim Hardaway is the latest politically incorrect dissenter to be put through the grinder. The NBA has disinvited him to the All Star bash. Tim has since assumed the supine position and apologized profusely.

I doubt if there would have been such a furor had he said that he "hates Bible-bashers".

So we're obliged to shut up and sit quietly while Amaechi tells the whole world he's homosexual, as if we really need to know that piece of information. This garbage is forced upon us while we're eating our cereal in the morning and anyone who voices a counter view is roundly condemned.

It's not the homosexuals who are persecuted. It's those who are revolted by their lifestyle.

4 posted on 02/16/2007 8:01:04 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I do not personally care if somebody is gay or not, but I am bothered by this asinine judge forgetting the free speech articles in our constitution. Either we run folks like that judge out of office, or we all suffer the onslaught of the loss of one of our basic freedoms as citizens. The judge should be censored and kicked out, and I do wonder why we have allowed this to continue on the downhill path it has taken. Hey Judge, what rights do we lose next?
5 posted on 02/16/2007 8:27:23 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; kristinn; Jim Robinson
U.S. District Judge Lawrence Stengel had concluded in dismissing the civil rights claim that a "permit" granted by the city to the homosexuals allowed police to silence the Christian activists' message on public streets.

This can not be allowed to stand, or it will be used as precedent until overturned.

6 posted on 02/16/2007 9:27:25 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
...a "permit" granted by the city to the homosexuals allowed police to silence the Christian activists' message on public streets.

Time to actually fight.

At every convservative, Republican, Christian or other "right wing" event, call police immediately to arrest all dissenters, based on this precedent.

7 posted on 02/16/2007 10:14:42 AM PST by polymuser (There is one war and one enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Isn't this decision out of Philadelphia? Surely it will be appealed.


8 posted on 02/16/2007 7:29:22 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

I agree -- Great idea at the next anti-Bush protest... call police immediately to arrest all the dissenters while citing this precedent.

Then you sue the police for failing to do their job, if they won't arrest the Rats.


9 posted on 02/16/2007 8:40:13 PM PST by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Wait until the NAZIS try to march again.


10 posted on 02/19/2007 10:48:59 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Here's my message for the homo-nazis:

ANTI-CHRISTIAN, FASCIST GAYS!
HOMO FASCISTS GO AWAY!


11 posted on 03/01/2007 11:40:10 PM PST by bigdcaldavis ("I'm not some candy-assed white liberal looking to turn you into better citizens." - Martin Querns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson