Replies

Free Republic
Browse · Search

Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pjr12345

He means this is not a thread to bash catholicism
but to discuss the article posted

7 posted on 01/01/2007 3:45:14 PM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf

Thank you!

9 posted on 01/01/2007 3:48:38 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf

Does that mean that challenging the basic premise with Scripture such as Romans 3:23 and 5:12 is not allowed?

How about Mary's own profession of her need for a savior (aka her sinful nature), in Luke 1:46-48?

Are these evidences not allowed?

13 posted on 01/01/2007 3:56:56 PM PST by pjr12345

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794