*** Well, I think I do...so when it fits the protestant perspective it's literal; but when it doesn't fit the protestant perspective one must finesse and massage what would normally be clear scriptural meaning?***
Well, I think I do...so when it fits the Catholic perspective it's literal; but when it doesn't fit the Catholic perspective one must finesse and massage what would normally be clear scriptural meaning?
volley.return.
***but let's get back to John 6:53-57...what about the words "flesh", "blood", "eat" and "drink"...***
Did Jesus walk out of the room with teeth marks on his body, hunks of flesh missing? Was his volume of blood less before and after the meal...
The meal that was a memorial of the Passover. The meal in which all the components were a symbolic picture of His person and works?
Yep context is important.
volley.return.