His premise is that the "archaic words" claim made against the AV is better suited to be made against the NIV.
Sorry but the "synonyms" in the AV suck. The NIV is clear in it's meaning. My daughter and I just went through them all and laughed at the AV list. The NIV was more understandable and clear in it's meaning. AND more specific. Daughter just said " I can be quite vexed without being grieved". And yearling is specific, fatling is not. And turbulent is waaaaaay past unstable. The list is just petty silliness.