The Other ID Opponents

Christianity Today ^ | April 25, 2006 | Rob Moll

[balch3]

This week, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary named creationist Kurt P. Wise to replace outgoing Intelligent Design proponent William Dembski. The theological and scientific differences between Dembski and Wise are deep and wide. Intelligent Design and creationism are not co-conspirators trying to overthrow Darwinian evolution.

[balch3]

Some good points in this article. ID is better than Darwinism, but Scientific Creationism is much more firmly grounded.

[js1138]

"I don't think the ID movement would be where it is even now if it was not for the general creation movement," says Ken Ham, president of AiG. "They're riding on the coattails of the creation movement."

[onedoug]

I agree.

I absolutely love Guillermo Gonzalez & Jay W Richards The Privileged Planet (Richards of The Discovery Institute) for its razor sharp perspective and very lucid writing.

Dembski's Inteligent Design however is Christianity not even disguised as science.

...Which is fine, but let's be clear on the terms of the debate.