Dear Dionysiusdecordealcis,
It seems to me that this gentlemen should not have even said what he's said. Having no first-hand evidence, not having witnessed or be subjected to the alleged actions, it's difficult for me to distinguish this from gossip.
The differences between this allegation and those made by Fr. Hoatson in the other thead are significant [ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1573773/posts ].
In the other case, Fr. Hoatson has claimed to have "personal knowledge" of the homosexual activities of some bishops. As well, he has made his accusations through a lawsuit, meaning that he's willing to come forward with evidence and testimony that will be acceptable in a court of law, and that he understands that he opens himself to liability if his charges are false. Fr. Hoatson's allegations deserve serious consideration.
These allegations seem like so much gossip, to me.
sitetest