Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tlRCta

Well, the passage about casting a tempting member away could and should (in this case particularly) be interpreted literally.


17 posted on 09/19/2005 4:19:14 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob

In the case of a faithful struggling with temptations of the flesh, perhaps there is a point when self-mutilation becomes a lesser sin. Even then, the advice would be to ask God rather than a surgeon for help.

A priest, however, in addition to avoiding sin himself should be in a position to teach others. If he had to resort to self-mutilation to avoid sin, he is no priest material.

The point of celibacy is properly ordered sexuality, not denial of sexuality.


21 posted on 09/19/2005 4:27:50 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob
Well, the passage about casting a tempting member away could and should (in this case particularly) be interpreted literally.

Canon 1 of the Council of Nicea forbids such "violence" by choice and to be retained as a priest. I don't think this canon has been overturned. Apparently, it must have been practiced for it to be specifically addressed in the very first canon.

"To those who can..."

Regards

86 posted on 09/20/2005 5:01:05 AM PDT by jo kus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson