Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Passion for Pain
The Autonomist ^ | Feb. 26, 2004 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 02/26/2004 6:03:26 PM PST by Hank Kerchief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Which are you? A lover of humanity or a lover of human suffering?

Hank

1 posted on 02/26/2004 6:03:26 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
How many times are you going to post this? WHy didn't you just bump your previous posting of this article?

Or, did it get bounced?

2 posted on 02/26/2004 6:05:24 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
How many times are you going to post this? WHy didn't you just bump your previous posting of this article?

It has only been posted once, so far. Do a search.

(Maybe it is similar to another post.)

Hank

3 posted on 02/26/2004 6:27:31 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fzob; P.O.E.; PeterPrinciple; reflecting; DannyTN; FourtySeven; x; dyed_in_the_wool; Zon; ...
PHILOSOPHY PING

(If you want on or off this list please freepmail me.)

Not exactly philosophy, but there are definitely philosophical questions raised by this article.

Hank

4 posted on 02/26/2004 6:30:27 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Which are you? A lover of humanity or a lover of human suffering?
Hank
1 Hank Kerchief


_____________________________________




How many times are you going to post this? WHy didn't you just bump your previous posting of this article?
Or, did it get bounced?
2 sinkspur



______________________________________



In his fervor to shut down heresy, sinky inadvertently answers your second question in the affirmative.
5 posted on 02/26/2004 6:58:55 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
See rock?

Crawl under.

6 posted on 02/26/2004 7:00:12 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I had to pick it up to read your hidden message.
7 posted on 02/26/2004 7:02:42 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: per loin; cripplecreek; smith288; Rutles4Ever; Shermy; Mamzelle; joesnuffy; dukeman; AAABEST; ...
"More blood, more pain, more suffering. Ah, that's the thing, isn't it?"

"But, I do not like to see suffering. I want people to be happy." the girl in white said.

"You must not be a Christian, then."

LC

8 posted on 02/26/2004 7:15:11 PM PST by Charles Dodgson ("Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast," said the queen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief; tpaine
You're so caught up in love of your philosophical self, that you love your sophet. Philo-sophic.

You haven't even learned lesson #1 though. That part of love is sacrificing for others. You want false happiness that doesn't exist, an illusion.

Love is a verb that requires pain.

Loving others is painful, you always have to sacrifice whether you're putting your kids through college, feeding the poor, cleaning up after somoeone, putting up with an idiotic internet poster or dying for others because you love them dearly.

You love yourself and want to be happy, though you're not. You hate Christianity and can't even take the pain of leaving your brothers and sisters alone.

Your philo-sophy is not very attractive.

9 posted on 02/26/2004 7:17:49 PM PST by AAABEST (<a href="http://www.angelqueen.org">Traditional Catholicism is Back and Growing</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Which are you? A lover of humanity or a lover of human suffering?

A lover of God.

10 posted on 02/26/2004 7:21:34 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Love is a verb that requires pain.

Wow, that's exactly what the article said you would say.

Thanks for the confirmation that Christians worship pain.

Hank

11 posted on 02/26/2004 7:28:54 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I pity you for your hatred of your fellow man, and I pity your family & acquaintances, who must suffer your martyr-ism.
12 posted on 02/26/2004 7:31:08 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mhking
A lover of God.

Which God? Allah, Jehovah, Zeus?

Hank

13 posted on 02/26/2004 7:32:43 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Which God? Allah, Jehovah, Zeus?

Not "A" god, but of God.

Certainly my perception and personal relationship with God is different from yours, though. And I would not presume to push my personal relationship with God off on you.

14 posted on 02/26/2004 7:42:24 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
The Passion of the Christ's theme is that suffering, not joy, is man's proper fate."

Sigh..., wishing this to be true does not make it so. Demonstrate the veracity of the above statement from the article by citing; Christian Scripture or other Christian dogma universally held. Please provide links to sources.

Thank you

15 posted on 02/26/2004 7:45:25 PM PST by conservonator (To be Catholic is to enjoy the fullness of Christian faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Jesus said he came that we might have life, and have it more abundantly. To say that Christianity is a religion that promotes suffering is completely wrong. I suffered far more pain when I was in Satan's fold. The passion of Jesus was inflicted by unbelievers, their sole purpose to be rid of this Christ. God, in his gracious and brilliant mercy, allowed this act of theirs to expiate the sin of mankind, the just one tasting death for everyman. The actions of Jesus were obedience to God, but God did not murder his Son; those who delivered him up were guilty of his death, the suffering clearly inflicted by them.
16 posted on 02/26/2004 7:50:20 PM PST by man of Yosemite ("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
one who loves God -- no one in their right mind can possibly love humanity in it's sinful, fallen, and depraved state, which fails to even comprehend the nature of God, His Righteousness, His Justice, and His Mercy. Your article clearly demonstrates this total lack of comprehension by fallen and unredeemed mankind.

Or to put it more directly here is the way St Paul put it in the first chapter of his first letter to the Church at Corinth :




20Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; 23but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.




please understand this clearly: it does not matter whether you mock it; it does not matter if you hate it; it does not matter if you choose to ignore it, it does not matter if you reject it - none of that matters, because you see, in the end, the universe functions by God's rules, not yours.

17 posted on 02/26/2004 7:50:31 PM PST by ahadams2 (Anglican Freeper Resource Page: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Christians worship pain?

Wow. I've never in my life seen somebody so completely not get it before.

But I'm wasting my breath, aren't I? I guess it's pretty clear that you just like to stir the pot but not ever really take a taste for yourself.

Enjoy...
18 posted on 02/26/2004 7:59:39 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
The Passion of the Christ's theme is that suffering, not joy, is man's proper fate."

Sigh..., wishing this to be true does not make it so. Demonstrate the veracity of the above statement from the article by citing; Christian Scripture or other Christian dogma universally held. Please provide links to sources.

You expect there to be a Scriptural reference that explains the theme of Mel Gibson's film?

The statement is about the theme of the film, not the theme of the Bible. But, if you are asking if that is the theme of the Bible, how about these?

Luke 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.

2 Cor 12:9 ... Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

James 5:10 Take, my brethren, the prophets, who have spoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction, and of patience.

While Christians universally use such passages to promote the idea that human suffering is a virtue, I personally do not believe that is the intended meaning of these verses.

Hank

19 posted on 02/26/2004 8:08:54 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
"While Christians universally use such passages to promote the idea that human suffering is a virtue, I personally do not believe that is the intended meaning of these verses."

You keep posting on this subject, but I don't see that you are willing actually to address the central issues.

Many of us see where your logic leads you astray, and would be glad to tell you, but you don't have ears to hear.
20 posted on 02/26/2004 8:16:54 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson