Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joint Catholic/Orthodox Statement Regarding the Nicene Creed
EWTN ^ | 10/31/04

Posted on 10/31/2003 11:08:40 AM PST by Aquinasfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: NYer
The paper thus recommends that Catholicism use the original text in worship

Good to see your side coming around. :-)

21 posted on 11/01/2003 6:37:39 PM PST by MarMema (KILLING ISN'T MEDICINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; livius; ...
Now we learn a 'new' creed? Or is it the old one was BAD?
22 posted on 11/01/2003 6:44:05 PM PST by narses ("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Cardinal Arinze of Nigeria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
The pictures are stunning. The colors, especially the blue on the ceiling and walls is beautiful. The outdoor altar area is something I have never seen before.

The school looks impressive, very small classes with just 300 students and it looks like it goes up thru high school.

A big step for this parish, monestary and school. Many years to them!
23 posted on 11/01/2003 6:50:06 PM PST by katnip (It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: narses
Now we learn a 'new' creed? Or is it the old one was BAD?

The Orthodox version (without the filioque) IS the old one.

24 posted on 11/01/2003 6:59:04 PM PST by newberger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Thanks for your reply.

So it is originality and uniqueness that counts in one's statement of religious beliefs and faith; it's important that it not be one prepared by others?

According to Paul, of course...
25 posted on 11/01/2003 9:52:04 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Don't you mean Profession of faith

I was copying and pasting from dictionary.com, but I think either word would be correct.

26 posted on 11/01/2003 9:53:26 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Paul said that we should be prepared to offer a reason, but he didn't say that we should be prepared to recite a reason that was prepared by others.

Which you just did anyway.

27 posted on 11/01/2003 10:20:16 PM PST by Romulus (Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: katnip
very similar to the cathedral we visited and also to the inside of Saint Basil's in Moscow. I want to paint our living room kind of like this. Put icons all over the walls. It would be like a permanent Orthodox sanctuary.

Also watched this older movie called The Sight where a hotel is painted sort of like this. I am definitely into this idea for decor.

28 posted on 11/01/2003 10:24:20 PM PST by MarMema (KILLING ISN'T MEDICINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Romulus; editor-surveyor; MarMema; FormerLib; Alamo-Girl; Aquinasfan
It was those Apostolic Fathers that compiled the New Testament that the Protestants claim always existed in its present form. In fact the Creed is older than the New Testament.

The Church formulated the Nicene Creed before it selected certain apostolic writings, called them the New Testament, and declared them to be Holy Scripture. Another way of looking at it is that God chose the people who were bound by the Nicene Creed to affirm the contents of the New Testament, thereby endorsing the theology of the creed. The Nicene Creed is therefore a reliable test of our interpretation of the New Testament. If we are at variance with the Nicene Creed, we are in error. So whoever denies the Trinity must also deny the New Testament, and whoever upholds the New Testament as Holy Scripture must also affirm the Trinity.

In the beginning, the Church did not have a formal creed, nor did it have a formal list of the books in the New Testament. Then it formulated the Nicene Creed to express its doctrines and to serve as a test of orthodox teaching. So for a while there was a Church with the Nicene Creed but, even though it used the books of the New Testament as Holy Scripture, it had no official statement saying that they were. After the Church was bound by the Nicene Creed, it made a formal list of the books in the New Testament. Therefore, whoever attempts to reconstruct the ancient Church with an official list of New Testament books but without the Nicene Creed is reconstructing an imaginary church that never existed. This doesn’t mean their church is invalid, it just means that it isn’t a historic reconstruction, because in any part of Church history in which there was an official list of New Testament books, the Nicene Creed was the official expression of faith and the final test of orthodoxy.

29 posted on 11/02/2003 9:49:13 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maestro
I agree that the Filioque Clause does not belong in the Nicene Creed. The Creed defines God as "God the Father" and that the Son is begotten of the Father and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. In that context, the Holy Spirit cannot proceed from the Son for the same reason the Son is not begotten of the Holy Spirit. St. Augustine and Western theologians defined God as "God the Trinity". Affirming the unity of the Trinity is of utmost importance. This is why they added the Filioque Clause. Because Christ said that He will send the Spirit, which comes from the Father, a case (although weak one) can be made for the Filioque. Ultimately it comes down to authority. Can a local council (Toledo)_alter the findings of the Ecumenical Councils of Nicea and Constantinople? Of course not.
30 posted on 11/03/2003 4:32:38 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Good point.
31 posted on 11/03/2003 4:48:34 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Thanks for the heads up!
32 posted on 11/03/2003 6:49:25 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
..........Ultimately it comes down to authority.........

Amen,.......Romans 10:17

Maranatha!!

(Romans 10:17)

bump!

33 posted on 11/03/2003 9:47:07 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Bumping this for some folks!


34 posted on 05/31/2004 8:49:35 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson