Skip to comments.
New needle exchange bill vetoed
sacramento bee ^
| 10-12-03
| jim sanders
Posted on 10/12/2003 8:50:36 AM PDT by wheelgunguru
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:00:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Legislation to make it easier for California cities and counties to develop needle-exchange programs for intravenous drug users was vetoed Saturday by Gov. Gray Davis.
With more than 200 bills awaiting action this weekend, Davis signed nine measures and vetoed five, including the needle-exchange proposal, AB 946.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: needleexchange; veto
To: wheelgunguru
Kudos to Gray Davis for getting it right. We shouldn't encourage people to continue their hazardous addiction by getting free needles from the government. Its one of his last acts wholly in the public interest.
2
posted on
10/12/2003 8:52:43 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: All
3
posted on
10/12/2003 8:55:20 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: goldstategop
Since the story is sketchy, I interpreted the bill to make it more restrictive on needle exchanges.
I think that currently it goes on as standard practice and the bill would make it necessary to have an emergency declared to allow exchanges.
What's your take?
To: goldstategop
"Kudos to Gray Davis for getting it right. We shouldn't encourage people to continue their hazardous addiction by getting free needles from the government. Its one of his last acts wholly in the public interest."
IMHO, from the public interest, vis a vis public health and the spread of HIV/AIDS, the vast majority of studies show needle exchanges work. I have not come across any study to the contrary, and I'm no fan of most current public health initiatives.
How anyone can willingly stick needles in their bodies, I can't understand, especially in light of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. But it must also be viewed in the light of recognizing human nature with its propensity for error and the result of the war on drugs(WOD).
If the drugs were not made artificially expensive by the WOD, there would be that many less folks using needles to satisfy their addiction as they could just snort it.
I believe informed conservatives understand that laws can't change the aberrations of human nature. People only change their harmful habits when they hit bottom and realize they caused a disaster because of their habits and actions. Laws that incarcerate them, providing them with 3 hots and a cot, don't do much either. The WOD and drug prohibition is a public health and civil liberty disaster.
5
posted on
10/12/2003 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
To: neverdem
Pardon me. I should have ended with "flame away".
6
posted on
10/12/2003 10:32:08 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson