Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McNabb Worse than Mediocre as Eagles Survive Skins 27-25
espn.com ^ | Oct. 5, 2003 | ESPN.com

Posted on 10/05/2003 6:02:10 PM PDT by litany_of_lies

Eagles 27, Skins 25

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- The Philadelphia Eagles wouldn't let the Washington Redskins pull out another close victory.

Patrick Ramsey overthrew Laveranues Coles on a 2-point conversion with 13 seconds left, and the Eagles beat the Redskins 27-25 on Sunday.

Ramsey rallied Washington from an 11-point deficit in the final 3:10, connecting with Darnerien McCants on a 32-yard touchdown pass in the final seconds.

But under pressure from Brandon Whiting, Ramsey hurried his throw to Coles in the corner of the end zone and the ball sailed over Coles' head.

After John Hall's fourth field goal, a 53-yarder, cut it to 27-19, the Redskins' Bryan Johnson recovered an onside kick at Washington's 43 with 1:13 left. Ramsey then drove the Redskins 57 yards in five plays.

Defensive end N.D. Kalu returned an interception 15 yards for a go-ahead TD and Brian Westbrook had a 19-yard TD run for the Eagles.

The Eagles (2-2) won for the first time at Lincoln Financial Field after opening the season with consecutive losses at their new stadium.

Washington (3-2) fell to 1-7 against NFC East teams under Steve Spurrier. All the Redskins' games have been decided by three points or less.

Playing without three Pro Bowl players in their secondary, the Eagles held Coles and Rod Gardner to just five catches combined in the first 57 minutes. Free safety Brian Dawkins (foot) and cornerback Bobby Taylor (foot) missed their third straight games. And cornerback Troy Vincent sat out with a hamstring injury.

Donovan McNabb completed 16 of 30 passes for 157 yards and his first TD of the season. He was intercepted twice. Ramsey finished 25-of-50 for 271 yards, one TD, two interceptions and one TD rushing.

This was McNabb's first game since conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh made comments about him that ignited a weeklong firestorm. Limbaugh said on last week's ESPN's "Sunday NFL Countdown" that McNabb was overrated because the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed.

McNabb said he did not mind criticism of his performance but was upset that Limbaugh made race an issue. The remarks forced Limbaugh to resign from the show.

Kalu, a former Redskin, broke a 13-all tie with his first career interception and TD late in the third quarter.

On a second-and-9, Ramsey's arm was hit by Eagles tackle Darwin Walker as he threw and the ball sailed up in the air. Kalu caught it at the 15, eluded an offensive lineman and rumbled untouched into the end zone.

Westbrook then put Eagles ahead by 11 with his TD run with 3:10 left. The Eagles drove 70 yards, holding the ball for 5:39. McNabb ran 6 yards on third-and-5 to keep the drive alive.

McNabb connected with fullback Jon Ritchie on a 4-yard TD pass for a 10-0 lead early in the second quarter. Roderick Hood intercepted a pass from Ramsey and returned it to Washington's 18, setting up the score.

Ramsey's 1-yard TD run made it 10-7 with 5:56 left in the first half. Former Eagle Jeremiah Trotter set up the score, intercepting McNabb and returning it 21 yards to the 1. On third down, Ramsey leaped over the top for the TD.

David Akers' 36-yard field goal late in the first half gave the Eagles a 13-7 lead. Akers gave the Eagles a 3-0 lead on a 52-yard FG in the first quarter.

Hall's 48-yard FG late in the first half cut Philadelphia's lead to 13-10. Hall hit a 45-yarder midway through the third to tie it at 13. His 37-yarder cut it to 20-16 in the fourth.

McNabb had just 19 yards rushing. He scrambled 54 yards to Washington's 10 on the Eagles' first possession, but a holding penalty on tight end Chad Lewis negated the play.

ESPN.com: HELP | MEDIA KIT | CONTACT US | TOOLS | SITE MAP Copyright ©2003 ESPN Internet Ventures. Terms of Use and


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: eagles; limbaugh; mcnabb; mediocre; nfl; overrated; redskins; rush; stats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: lavrenti
McNabb is good, showed great potential and character in the course of his college and professional career. He just plays for a mediocre offensive team, poorly coached.

McNabb was totally inaccurate on passes over 5 yards all day. It reminded me of that arthritis drug commerical wherein the graying athlete is trying to throw the football through the tire hung from the tree. I think the arthritic guy was more accurate than was McNabb on Sunday.

61 posted on 10/06/2003 9:16:49 AM PDT by montag813 (Fire Tenet...Jail Joseph Wilson...Rally 'Round Our President, Dammit!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Akira
"I've been bugged by all the wrath directed at McNabb this week"

What wrath would that be?

62 posted on 10/06/2003 9:17:32 AM PDT by subterfuge (God will NOT be mocked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
I didn't realize how much PC has infected sports coverage. Now I do.

Well, the number 24 is in every baseball park as a retired number never to be worn again by anyone as if Jackie Robinson was the greatest to ever play the game. He was good but not so good as to be deified.

63 posted on 10/06/2003 9:29:34 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Why does Clemson wear orange? Play in it on Sat. hunt in it on Sun. Then work release.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
Well, the number 24 is in every baseball park as a retired number never to be worn again by anyone as if Jackie Robinson was the greatest to ever play the game. He was good but not so good as to be deified.

FWIW, I don't have a problem with that (I think it's really #42).

Jackie R did more to move professional sports, especially baseball, from the Jim Crow era to modernity than anybody else. If he fails, he sets back the civil rights movement bigtime, maybe to the point where the late-50s/early 60s civil rights movement doesn't succeed. It think he was THAT important.

Also, Jackie R was a pretty conservative guy politically. Jesse Jackson would be denouncing him if Jackie were alive today.

64 posted on 10/06/2003 9:37:38 AM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
You're right it was 42.

Doubly right on what his success meant.

However, that does not warrant retiring a number. Only stellar play deserves a retired number and then only for the team for which he played, not the entire sport.

65 posted on 10/06/2003 9:44:00 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Why does Clemson wear orange? Play in it on Sat. hunt in it on Sun. Then work release.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Defendingliberty
Except that everytime McNabb validates the mediocre tab on the field, the media validates their bias by ignoring McNabb's mediocrity. The whole thing is laughable.
66 posted on 10/06/2003 9:45:07 AM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
"I like McNabb, though. This offense is badly put together. I think Rush was wrong, and wasn't really paying attention to the serious problems the Eagles offense has faced since preseason, with all the hold-outs."

The Eagles offense has been suspect for years and so has McNabb's QB play.

67 posted on 10/06/2003 9:46:43 AM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
However, that does not warrant retiring a number. Only stellar play deserves a retired number and then only for the team for which he played, not the entire sport.

If you agree he belongs in the Hall of Fame based on his on-field achievements (a 10-season career batting average of .311, his above-average fielding [can't find stats], and his legendary ability to disrupt opposing pitchers is enough for me), we're just going to have to agree to disagree about whether his breaking the color barrier is enough justification to eternally retire his number for all teams.

Now let's get on to important stuff, like whether 10-year pros from Japan should get Rookie of the Year awards.

68 posted on 10/06/2003 9:59:02 AM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Akira
McNabb is better than Dilfer, and the Ravens D was better than Philly's the past 2 years.

Sure...but my point remains, that just because the Eagles made it to the championship is not proof of his being the best Quarterback - especially not when we have had several middling QBs make it to championships on the back of an excellent defense. Dilfer was a very good role-player - essentially, just don't blow the game by making a silly turnover. Dilfer was functionally not a QB at all, and he wasn't required to be for his team to succeed. McNabb is clearly better than that...but there are several QBs in each conference that are better QBs than McNabb.

You are also correct that the Eagles Defense was not the completely dominating thing that the Ravens was. That just means they needed more of an offense to compliment them. The Eagles defense was the core of the Eagles team, with the offense an occasional supporting cast. The Eagles offense didn't need to dominate, or even be exceptional - all it had to do was not blow things, be occassionally successful, and take advantage when the defense handed them a plum as they did with yesterdays 18 yeard touchdown "drive".

As you describe, Pro-Bowl selection is hardly objective, nor is it neccessarily even a reflection of what it claims to be due to the factors you cite. On the other hand, McNabb DOES bring more to the game than his middling statistics would suggest...I just don't think the case can be well made that he is a top-tier QB, at least yet.

All of this is getting off the point. McNabb is not, nor has he been a top-tier QB, so why has he been presented as such and honored as such? Is it implausible that he has been getting more than his fair share of attention and praise because of media cheerleading? What other reasons might there be for this?

69 posted on 10/06/2003 10:10:54 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
I knew the Skins would lose when LaVarr Arrington got a 15 yard Personal Foul penalty for accidentally giving McNabb a dirty look in the first quarter. Wait, that was actually called "roughing the passer."

It must have been really rough, since McNabb actually almost moved his feet when Arrington pulled up and ran into him.
70 posted on 10/06/2003 10:13:35 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
I was referring to the posts yesterday (Sunday) afternoon, referring to the Eagles score and taking obvious delight in McNabb's stats (which again were certainly not spectacular). Some of the posters obviously wanted him to fail, as if that would be some vindication for Rush, when in fact Rush's main point was directed at the media.

Perhaps "wrath" was a bit strong, I just felt many of the comment were misdirected, that's all.
71 posted on 10/06/2003 10:35:06 AM PDT by Akira ("Experience is a hard teacher, but fools will have no other." - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rockinonritalin
I agree. Based on McNabb's news conference you would have thought Rush said something completely different. That disappointed me also.
72 posted on 10/06/2003 10:36:19 AM PDT by Akira ("Experience is a hard teacher, but fools will have no other." - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: montag813
loudmouth Chris Collingsworth bashing Limbaugh and praising McNabb

I never liked Collingsworth. His suit always looked funny with those diapers on under his pants.

73 posted on 10/06/2003 10:37:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Akira
Based on McNabb's news conference you would have thought Rush said something completely different

McNabb's a looser,,just look as his stats.

74 posted on 10/06/2003 10:39:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Agreed

Disagree

10 year pros from Japan should only receive Lookie of the Year honors.

75 posted on 10/06/2003 11:07:02 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Why does Clemson wear orange? Play in it on Sat. hunt in it on Sun. Then work release.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
You mean they are playing football, with the Cubs winning haven't notice anything about the Whiney over rated NFL.

It has become so overa rated and so boring.

Haven't seen anything exiciting in the lock step NFL in years.

76 posted on 10/06/2003 11:07:45 AM PDT by dts32041 (Is it time to practice decimation with our representatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Why did the media vote him as runner up for MVP in 2000 ???

It makes no sense based on the QB ratings. Check it out:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/stats?statsId=4650

This last week was a good example. His QB rating of 51 is horrible -- but Philly D won the game. Rush was right!!!
77 posted on 10/06/2003 11:13:23 AM PDT by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TheExploited
Heaven help me, but I have a policy on drafting quarterbacks for fantasy football. It always seems that some guys are drafted way too high.

By the way, did you catch how Gus Frerotte is slingin' the ball for Minnesota?
78 posted on 10/06/2003 11:14:56 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Silas
Here are year 2000 rankings for NFC QBs only. How does this make McNabb the 2nd best player in the entire league ???

http://msn.sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statistics?stat=pass&sort=rat&league=nfc&season=2&year=2000
79 posted on 10/06/2003 11:16:07 AM PDT by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Silas
To be fair, his rushing statistics were impressive that year.
80 posted on 10/06/2003 1:49:36 PM PDT by Capt. Jake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson