Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians endorse GOP's McClintock!
WorldNetDaily ^ | October 4, 2003 | Steve Kubby

Posted on 10/04/2003 9:12:29 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR

A strange thing is happening in California politics: The GOP is turning its back on a popular, conservative Republican to support a Hollywood actor who opposes nearly every social issue the Republicans claim to stand for.

Meanwhile, Libertarians across the state of California are making an unprecedented exodus from the Libertarian party's candidate and instead supporting California state Sen. Tom McClintock, a conservative Republican. Nothing like this has happened before in the Libertarian Party and it speaks volumes about the character and integrity of Tom McClintock.

Why is McClintock attracting so much attention from the "Party of Principle"? It's because McClintock is the only candidate who is prepared to veto the reckless spending spree that has overtaken Sacramento.

In a recent cover story that appeared in the Orange County Weekly, R. Scott Moxley explains why McClintock is admired and feared for his willingness to veto spending bills. "Ask Sacramento Democrats what they think of McClintock. They'll likely tell you the last man they want holding the veto pen to their spending habits is the relentlessly frugal 47-year-old conservative from Thousand Oaks."

I should tell you that the Orange County Weekly is anti-Bush, and anti-conservative. So a cover story endorsing McClintock is already generating "horror on the left and suspicion in establishment GOP circles," according to Moxley. But the message is too powerful to ignore: The spending spree has to stop and nobody has the guts to stop it, except McClintock.

When Gray Davis first ran for governor in 1998, California's economy was the envy of the world. As Libertarian nominee for governor, I campaigned against Gray Davis and the spending habits of the Democrats. I predicted back then that the California economy was going to collapse because of the rapidly expanding role of government in our lives and in our pocketbooks. (In fact, one popular radio host denounced me for my alarmist economic views.) Back then, nobody wanted to hear that, but now – five years later – California's fiscal problems are painfully apparent to everyone.

Here's how the Orange County Weekly sizes up the problem: "While California's population rose 21 percent during the Davis era, the Democrats raised state spending by a whopping 40 percent. They've added 44,000 new public employees to the state payroll and, in the midst of the current fiscal crisis, strapped taxpayers with an additional $700 million per year in ridiculously generous public-employee pension perks."

A group calling itself, Libertarians for McClintock, has posted a website which has an impressive list of California Libertarians who are endorsing Sen. McClintock. The site lists a number of issues with which the state's leading Libertarians are in strong agreement with McClintock.

Tom on the issues

Medical Marijuana: "The people of California spoke clearly on that subject. The federal government has no right to intervene." Tom says he voted for Proposition 215 in 1996, which legalized medical marijuana in California.

Cut Taxes And Spending: He was the first to call for repealing the car tax, beginning a petition drive to force a vote on the issue. Since then, all the other major candidates for governor have jumped on Tom's bandwagon, echoing his call to repeal the car tax.

Restore Choice In Education: "Two simple but far-reaching changes are needed to turn the system right-side up: first, restore to parents the ultimate choice over their child's teacher, subject only to academic qualifications and space limitations set by the teacher; and second, pay teachers according to the number of students they attract."

Limited Government Liberates People: "Jefferson observed that a government which attempts to do more than it ought will accomplish less. His America today is not experiencing a crisis of confidence in government; but rather a rediscovery of the limitations of government. To the existing establishment, that may be a crisis. But to the people, it is a liberation."

Right To Keep And Bear Arms: "The right is absolute. In a free nation, government has no authority to forbid me from speaking because I might shout "fire" in a crowded theater. Government has no authority to forbid me from using my fist to defend myself because I might also use it to strike your nose. And government has no authority to forbid me from owning a firearm because I might shoot an innocent victim."

Draft Registration: As co-chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, Tom led the fight to kill the bill requiring young people to register for the draft before they could get a driver's license. The bill was defeated in committee.

Free Trade: "Respecting the right of consumers to make their own decisions in the marketplace without having government interpose its judgment for theirs."

Slash Regulation And Bureaucracy: "This is the opportunity of our generation, this historic turning point, to roll back the taxes, the regulations destroying our economy, and to rein in our out-of-control bureaucracies.

Superiority Of Individual Over Collective Decision-Making: "In any human enterprise, individuals making their own decisions according to their own lights produce a far higher level of prosperity and a far wiser and more just allocation of resources than decisions made collectively and administered centrally."

There is an old saying that character is destiny. Certainly the past decisions of the other top contenders in the recall election are still shaping their destiny. Quite frankly, we are being asked to place our trust in those who have repeatedly demonstrated themselves to be unworthy of our trust. Or, we can stop fooling around and vote for a man who has a long track record of walking his talk and standing up for the rights of the individual against the tyranny of "collective decision making."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; endorsement; governor; mcclintock; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2003 9:12:29 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
So, basically, the Libertarians have endorsed Bustamante.

Way to go.

/sarcasm
2 posted on 10/04/2003 9:15:47 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
As Steve Kubby writes from his new marijuana Heaven on Earth, socialist Chretien's Cannda.
3 posted on 10/04/2003 9:16:46 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

4 posted on 10/04/2003 9:17:07 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
For the most part, Libertarians hate the Republican Party and President Bush. Anything they can do to hurt them is what they want to do. It's pathetic. Watch the things they will pull in 2004.
5 posted on 10/04/2003 9:17:54 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
If the Dems mangae to convince Cruz to drop out, you could see Tom winning the whole thing..once again, their strategery blow up in their faces..
6 posted on 10/04/2003 9:18:12 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
...California politics: The GOP is turning its back on a popular, conservative Republican to support a Hollywood actor who opposes nearly every social issue the Republicans claim to stand for.


Just WIN, Baby!!!!

7 posted on 10/04/2003 9:18:26 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Wait4Truth
Sick of the LA Times? Had enough? Click the link below to get revenge!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/995037/posts
9 posted on 10/04/2003 9:21:06 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

10 posted on 10/04/2003 9:21:33 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
Why didn't they (Libertarian Party) endorse one of the Libertarians who are running on the ballot?
11 posted on 10/04/2003 9:22:55 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
I've grown to respect and agree with many libertarians, but as usual, it seems that their only purpose here is to play spoiler, abandoning their low-vote spoiler candidate for the big-vote spoiler Tom.
12 posted on 10/04/2003 9:25:26 AM PDT by Conservative til I die (Scratch an evangelical long enough and you'll uncover a heretic or even a blasphemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
They did. Read the article, it says they're abandoning their own candidate to vote for McClintock. Why???? Their spite will be more visible that way.
13 posted on 10/04/2003 9:26:31 AM PDT by Conservative til I die (Scratch an evangelical long enough and you'll uncover a heretic or even a blasphemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
"Why is McClintock attracting so much attention from the "Party of Principle"? It's because McClintock is the only candidate who is prepared to veto the reckless spending spree that has overtaken Sacramento."

Try reading the article before you reply!
14 posted on 10/04/2003 9:27:32 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR ((R)nold's like a chrome plated Yugo - all show and no go! McClintock for Governor of California!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
If the Republican Party was true to it's claims, there wouldn't be need for a Libertarian Party.

But it's not, so there is.

15 posted on 10/04/2003 9:30:36 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO. I'm far too conservative to be a real Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
One irrelevancy endorses another. How circular.
16 posted on 10/04/2003 9:32:07 AM PDT by strela (Will Tom McClintock have to "make a re$ervation" to pay back all that Indian money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
They should endorse Ned Roscoe who is running as a Libertarian.

Another reason Libertarians can't be taken seriously.

17 posted on 10/04/2003 9:32:18 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
It was my private assessment of Libertarians, that they were most definitely NOT conservatives. Oh, some of the goals look the same, but conservatives insist on following the spirit of the law, while Libertarians tend to believe law codes are an evil unto themselves, and should be done away with, in so far as that is a practical goal.

Liberals, on the other hand, simply think the law is a tool for slapping your opponents around, selectively enforced or ignored, as the situation may require. Therefore, there should be a large and intentionally confusing law code, embracing laws that may be mutually contradictory, to be applied to the case at hand. The name of the game is gaining and holding ascendancy.

So the belief that Libertarian support of McClintock is somehow tacit support of Bustamante, may prove a little premature. Suppose this circumstance - that McClintock gains a LARGER vote total than Bustamante, and it was Libertarian support that did it. How does support of McClintock lend support to Bustamante?
18 posted on 10/04/2003 9:32:45 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Do you know what the Libertarian Party stands for?

Legalization of drugs. Is that principled?

Legalization of prostitution. Is that principled?

Legalization of sex with minors. Is that principled?
19 posted on 10/04/2003 9:34:19 AM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
Congratulations Tom! You FINALLY received an endorsement! And I even understand that they weren't completely stoned when they made it.
20 posted on 10/04/2003 9:35:26 AM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson