Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender
How much should they be taxed in order for their influence to be reduced to the point that you feel comfortable with them.

How about if they are taxed the same percentage as those few gambling patrons who actually win in Indian Casinos; 40%?

There are 150 Chumash Indians in Santa Ynez, CA splitting the revenue from the Chumash Casino. Each of the 150 people splitting the pot receives approximately $50,000 tax free each month. Yep, you read right: $50,000 per month. They refuse to share the proceeds with the 7,500-9,000 Chumash decendants estimated to be living in California.

I spoke with an LA Times reporter who has been working on the story for the past three months. Apparently the Times is waiting until after the election to expose the malfeasance occuring at the Chumash Casino.

31 posted on 10/03/2003 8:06:16 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Zevonismymuse
Define "Tax Free", if you please, because in Claifornia 90+ percent of the indians pay state income taxes (very very few live 'tax free') and all pay federal income taxes.

So, if you could cite some reliable sources that say they are getting this 'tax-free', I'd appreciate it.
41 posted on 10/03/2003 8:12:24 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks ("Sir, Evil, Disembodied Voice of Doom on line 1... shall I tell him you are in a meeting?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Zevonismymuse
There are 150 Chumash Indians in Santa Ynez, CA splitting the revenue from the Chumash Casino. Each of the 150 people splitting the pot receives approximately $50,000 tax free each month. Yep, you read right: $50,000 per month. They refuse to share the proceeds with the 7,500-9,000 Chumash decendants estimated to be living in California.

50,000 a month, huh? That sure doesn't jive with all the people I know up at Santa Ynez. It really doesn't jive with all the people I know who go up to Santa Ynez to sell their stuff during per cap day.

Refuse to share with non-members? Come on, back in 1978, and again in 1984, and again in 1986 the tribal chairman at Santa Ynez wanted all those of Chumash descent to join the tribe. But the coastals wanted to get their own tribe, and the deep inlanders wanted their own tribe, and the former islanders wanted their own tribe.. They refused to join Santa Ynez and mumbled about getting their own federal recognition.

Division, well before the casino, is what has affected what is happening today. I've always said that there is nothing more annoying than Indian vs Indian. The Tongva are divided (four ways), the Acjachemens are divided (two ways) - surprise, neither are federally recognized.

I support dramatically higher fees if the Chumash want to expand their compact, and I support their soverignty in deciding who is a member of their tribe, and I support the decisions of those who have declined to be part of that tribe.
46 posted on 10/03/2003 8:20:39 AM PDT by kingu (100 percent of liberals would like to see Free Republic fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson