Skip to comments.
Has Anyone Changed Their Vote as Result of the Gray Davis/LA Times Smear Attack?
Posted on 10/02/2003 2:59:13 PM PDT by ambrose
Has Anyone Changed Their Vote as Result of the Gray Davis/LA Times Smear Attack?
TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Please, no flaming or trolling. I am looking to see if anyone here has changed how they intend to vote on Questions 1 and 2 of the recall - i.e. anyone previously supporting Grayout's ouster now support keeping him in office? Has anyone switched from Arnold to Tom, or Tom to Arnold?
Please do not respond if you just signed up.
Thanks.
1
posted on
10/02/2003 2:59:14 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: All
|
There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
10/02/2003 3:00:23 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: ambrose
Not me.
3
posted on
10/02/2003 3:00:25 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Prop 53: YES|Prop 54: YES|Recall: YES|Governor: TOM, but will settle for Arnie)
To: ambrose; Argus
Nope, not me. Argus-care to weigh in?
4
posted on
10/02/2003 3:01:45 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: ambrose
I'd be more curious to see who Freepers would prefer if this race was solely between Arnold and McClintock.
5
posted on
10/02/2003 3:02:19 PM PDT
by
GSWarrior
To: ambrose
No.
6
posted on
10/02/2003 3:02:39 PM PDT
by
South40
(Vote for Mcclintock, elect cruz)
To: ambrose
Arianna was so shocked by the LATimes story, that she is now seriously not going to vote for Arnold. Unless he calls...
7
posted on
10/02/2003 3:03:21 PM PDT
by
per loin
To: ambrose
No.
To: per loin
lol!
Arianna is the perfect argument for immigration reform.
9
posted on
10/02/2003 3:06:22 PM PDT
by
South40
(Vote for Mcclintock, elect cruz)
To: GSWarrior
I'd be more curious to see who Freepers would prefer if this race was solely between Arnold and McClintock.Hell, why don't we ask whom they would support if Reagan was cured of Alzheimers and jumped into the race? Sometimes to ask a question is to answer it. But we don't have that hypothetical.
10
posted on
10/02/2003 3:07:20 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
I'm sure you already know my answer to this question, but just for the record ...
No.
:-)
D
To: ambrose
If there is one Freeper still posting here who cannot see the absolutely essential need to defeat every democrat, then I'm afraid for our country.Tom McClintock is an impediment, not an answer. Sorry about that.
There is no doubt that the timing of the attack on President Bush over Novak's July column, the attack on Arnold in the LA times today, and the drug attack on Limbaugh today, is in part an attempt to color the California race. Without California, all of the midgets running for president have zero chance.
What we have seen in the past twenty four hours is the Democrats version of "Shock and Awe." As for me, I am neither shocked nor awed, for I experienced those tactics personally during the Clinton administration.
To: billhilly
Excellent post.
13
posted on
10/02/2003 3:12:22 PM PDT
by
South40
(Vote for Mcclintock, elect cruz)
To: ambrose
No. I was already planning to vote for Arnold.
14
posted on
10/02/2003 3:14:32 PM PDT
by
owl
To: ambrose
Bush drunk driving arrest, the rumor that Bush plans to cut sugar subsidies on the eve of the LA Senate race. Someone's got to anticipate and have a strategy in advance for this kind of stuff.
15
posted on
10/02/2003 3:16:26 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: daviddennis
I am curious because I think we might be a microcosm of the larger public. If this story was to erode Arnold's support among anyone, it would seem most likely with hard core conservatives.
On the other hand, the unaffiliated "independent" voters are a notoriously fickle lot. The real danger is if they conclude that it is better to "go with the devil you know" (Davis)... Bustamante is damaged goods, and people think Tom can't win, and there is no way to change that self-defeating opinion with four days to go.
Thus if Arnold implodes, so does the recall.
16
posted on
10/02/2003 3:20:18 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: billhilly
good post except for the McClintock zinger.
17
posted on
10/02/2003 3:21:45 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: eureka!
At the beginning of the recall campaign, I said to my wife, "The Friday before the election, the LA Times will unload a giant stinkbomb on whichever Republican they fear most. That's the guy I'll vote for."
The Times was a day early (leading me to believe they have followup for tomorrow and Monday's editions). But they didn't disappoint me.
I was leaning toward McClintock.
Now I'm definitely voting for Arnold.
I hope he wins in a landslide.
18
posted on
10/02/2003 3:22:39 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: per loin
Arianna was so shocked by the LATimes story, that she is now seriously not going to vote for Arnold. Unless he calls... Best line of the day.
19
posted on
10/02/2003 3:22:57 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: ambrose
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
