Knewt Royce and Timothy Phelps are from Newsday I believe. They share bylines, as far as I can tell by googling their names up. They write on foreign affairs & terrorism. Two new names to throw into the mix.
1 posted on
09/30/2003 4:44:21 PM PDT by
dogbyte12
To: Peach; Mo1; Miss Marple; kattracks; Brian S
FYI
2 posted on
09/30/2003 4:45:37 PM PDT by
dogbyte12
To: dogbyte12; aristeides; seamole; okie01; Peach
4 posted on
09/30/2003 4:52:06 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Defend The Right To Claim My Dissent Is Censored By Your Disagreement!)
To: dogbyte12
I don't have time to do any digging at the moment, but I will throw this in: Newsday has always approached its reporting from a weird sort of mid-60s paleoliberal viewpoint. Whoever Royce and Phelps are, don't expect them to be registered Republicans.
5 posted on
09/30/2003 4:52:24 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: dogbyte12
To: dogbyte12
Newsday......rabidly anti republican
11 posted on
09/30/2003 4:56:36 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: dogbyte12
I'll bet this is what happened. My quotes from vague memory of events.
Wilson smeared Cheney in his July op-ed, by saying Cheney ignored his report from Africa, and lied in the SOTU.
Cheney and his people said, "we had no report or memo, we made a general request of the CIA to check into the uranium claim, we did not know who they sent".
Cheney told Russert he did not even know Wilson.
Wilson then admitted he made no written report.
Somewhere in the gov. Bush and Cheney's people called reporters to say, "we don't know Wilson, did not request that he be sent, but his wife works there, so she probably put his name up to go".
In defending themselves against smears, they probably did not think it thru.
Who knows. Do these events sound right?
To: dogbyte12
Lets see: the Bush WH cooperates fully, preserving all records and information, while the Clinton WH would have had everything shredded, wiped (both hard drives and people's memories), and cover stories formulated by this time.
What a difference.
To: dogbyte12
Need some Time magazine reporters in there as well:
In July Time Magazine Interview, Joe Wilson Said His Wife Had Nothing To Do With Niger Trip
|
|
|
|
Posted by Pubbie On 09/30/2003 2:38 PM CDT with 87 comments
Time Magazine ^ | Thursday, Jul. 17, 2003 | By MATTHEW COOPER, MASSIMO CALABRESI AND JOHN F. DICKERSONAnd some government officials have noted to TIME in interviews, (as well as to syndicated columnist Robert Novak) that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. These officials have suggested that she was involved in her husband's being dispatched Niger to investigate reports ...
|
34 posted on
09/30/2003 5:23:25 PM PDT by
Stultis
To: dogbyte12
"What do you mean, 'the leaker was a Democrat'. Lie damn you"
59 posted on
09/30/2003 6:29:21 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: dogbyte12
WHY is Laurie Dhue on 'Fox' referencing Wilson's wife as an 'undercover agent' for CIA?
Am I missing something here or is this just a 'truth be damned' story across the board.
60 posted on
09/30/2003 6:34:08 PM PDT by
cricket
To: dogbyte12
"Much Ado About Nothing".
aka: "The Dims Are Desperate For An Issue For 2004".
Already coming to a Leftist Theater near you.
Feh!
To: dogbyte12
boy, those guys at the WH are P.O.'d.
GO GET 'EM GW!
75 posted on
09/30/2003 9:17:10 PM PDT by
bonesmccoy
(Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson