Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA seeks probe of White House; Agency asks Justice to investigate leak of employee’s identity
MSNBC-NBC News ^ | Sept. 26, 2003

Posted on 09/27/2003 12:53:11 AM PDT by RDangerfield

The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman’s husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush’s since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium from Africa, NBC News has learned.

The former, Joseph Wilson, who was acting ambassador to Iraq before the first Gulf War, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to investigate a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buy uranium there. Although Wilson discredited the report, Bush cited it in his State of the Union address in January among the evidence he said justified military action in Iraq.

The administration has since had to repudiate the claim. CIA Director George Tenet said the 16-word sentence should not have been included in Bush’s Jan. 28 speech and publicly accepted responsibility for allowing it to remain in the president’s text. Wilson published an article in July alleging, however, that the White House recklessly made the charge knowing it was false.

“We spend billions of dollars on intelligence,” Wilson wrote. “But we end up putting something in the State of the Union address, something we got from another intelligence agency, something we cannot independently verify, in an area of Africa where the British have no on-the-ground presence.”

The next week, columnist Robert Novak published an article in which he revealed that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIA operative specializing in weapons of mass destruction. “Two senior administration officials told me Wilson’s wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate,” Novak wrote. The White House has denied being Novak’s source, whom he has refused to identify. But Wilson has said other reporters have told him White House officials leaked Plame’s identity.

NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate whether White House officials blew Plame’s cover in retaliation against Wilson. Revealing the identities of covert officials is a violation of two laws, the National Agents’ Identity Act and the Unauthorized Release of Classified Information Act.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobnovak; ciaagent; josephwilson; karlrove; leak; plame; valerieplame; whitehouse; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Breaking news-big. This is excerpted. Full story

This follows up a story on Slate.com from Sept. 16 that most people ignored. The White House probably noticed it. Did Rove Blow a Spook's Cover? The White House won't say. September 16

1 posted on 09/27/2003 12:53:12 AM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
The CIA should investigate Wilson's wife for nepotism since she was the one who recommended her husband to go on a "fact finding mission" that was really nothing more than an effort to stage a political hit on behalf of the antiwar crowd.
2 posted on 09/27/2003 1:05:03 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley; Alamo-Girl; Cindy
fyi
3 posted on 09/27/2003 1:05:44 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Well, this is dirt --- wonder how it will end up. We'll see.
4 posted on 09/27/2003 1:25:25 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
Let's see if Novak will go to jail for contempt of court rather than reveal a source.
5 posted on 09/27/2003 1:42:40 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
Boggles my mind that they claim the uranium statement was discredited.
6 posted on 09/27/2003 1:44:11 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
They are absolute in the "discredited" statement when we know that is still credited in GB,the source Bush used.
7 posted on 09/27/2003 2:41:50 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa
I have a feeling that this is about another matter I read about a month or so back concerning a whistle blower that told about the incompetence and deliberate foot dragging that made 9/11 possible concerning a deliberate failure to translate incoming information and it went right to the top of the agency.
8 posted on 09/27/2003 3:02:16 AM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Its going to take more than that, this story isn't going away that easy.
9 posted on 09/27/2003 3:07:30 AM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
No one seems to worry abour Linda Tripp's personal data released.
10 posted on 09/27/2003 3:35:56 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: RDangerfield
Breaking big? Hardly.

Sometimes you ask for an investigation in order to deflate an opponents' charges.

I can see it now. Dean, trying to make hay, starts hammering the administration on Wilson. The administration's answer? The Justice Department investigated those allegations and found nothing unusual.

12 posted on 09/27/2003 4:00:38 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: RDangerfield
Oh no where is the "Independent Counsel" when we need one.

Now Mr. Wilson has been talking please don't tell me that only the "White House" knew what his wife did.
14 posted on 09/27/2003 4:05:46 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: hydrogenfix
The problem with your counter-point is that the angry left, regardless of what is said about Plame Wilson, is going to vote against Bush. But there are plenty of people who would 'even think about voting for Dean' (should he be the nominee) who would be succeptible to propaganda and demagoguery. Every election, there are 'independents' and 'moderates' who are on the fence. Dean's supporters would not give an Ashcroft Justice Department clearing creedence, but the mushy middle will.

People forget that Ashcroft has pretty high approval ratings, despite the efforts to demonize him.

16 posted on 09/27/2003 4:10:59 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
Bump
17 posted on 09/27/2003 4:21:44 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
Even they call it a minor flap in Slate.
18 posted on 09/27/2003 4:22:04 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Wilson is an officious, nasty piece of goods. His appearances on television have demonstrated a mean streak a mile wide and ten miles deep. Like the majority of retired Foreign Service officers he believes he walks on water; he accepts no criticism, and answers only the questions he wants to. The fact that the administration used an ultra-liberal Democrat to do this investigation demonstrates that someone (perhaps someone at the CIA itself) did not do his/her homework.
19 posted on 09/27/2003 4:33:02 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
The fact that the administration used an ultra-liberal Democrat to do this investigation demonstrates that someone (perhaps someone at the CIA itself) did not do his/her homework.

Well, you're missing the point of the story. Wilson was not appointed by "the administration". He was sent off by a quasi-rogue operation, i.e., not cleared all the way through, and the decision to send Wilson was based on the recommendation of Wilson's WIFE, and before the decision was vetted the trip by Wilson was already underway.

After all, by Wilson's own statements, it was little more than a tourist visit with a few meetings over tea -- it wasn't an 'operation' in any real sense.

Wilson inflated the significance of his trip in his own mind, and the press took the bait.

20 posted on 09/27/2003 5:31:53 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson