Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Acxiom’s stake in terror war under fire [Says Wesley Clark not involved in JetBlue scandal]
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ^ | September 24, 2003 | JAKE BLEED

Posted on 09/24/2003 10:08:54 AM PDT by HAL9000

Little Rock’s Acxiom Corp. has spent most of the two years since the attacks of Sept. 11 looking for government contracts to help fight the war on terror. It has found the contracts. Now it has a fight on its hands. The data-management company is involved in a growing dispute over the release of information on millions of airline passengers to a Defense Department contractor last year.

Acxiom sold that contractor demographic data on roughly 2 million airline passengers — about 40 percent of those involved — as part of its role in the war on terror.

As a result it now faces criticism from a Washington, D. C., privacy rights group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

That group filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission on Monday, claiming that Acxiom and JetBlue Airways Corp. violated privacy policies that both companies publicize online, and thus violated federal laws against deceptive trade practices.

JetBlue became the target of an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security on Monday for its role in releasing the information. Lawsuits filed in Salt Lake City and Los Angeles against the airline seek class-action status, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday. "They made a lot of assurances to the public about how information — personal information — would be handled," said Marcia Hofmann, a spokesman for the privacy rights group, "when in fact, as far as I knew, there is no evidence that no one was being told that this information had been sold."

Airline security is an area Acxiom had hoped to work in since as early as February 2002, according to lobbying reports filed with the U.S. House of Representatives.

Wesley Clark, an Acxiom board member and now a presidential front-runner for the Democratic Party, had lobbied for the company, according to those reports, in the areas of "information transfers, airline security and homeland security issues."

Clark was not involved in the contract addressed in the group’s complaint and no longer lobbies for Acxiom, company spokesman Dale Ingram said.

Calls to Clark’s campaign staff were not returned Tuesday.

Privacy is a touchy subject at Acxiom, which says it handles information on "a vast majority of U.S. households" for both itself and its clients, Ingram said.

In the past, the company has claimed to have information on 96 percent of U.S. households. "Building trust is central to our business, to our clients and our consumers," Ingram said. "We are very interested in setting the record straight."

Privacy is also a major issue at the FTC, which in recent years has gone after several major corporations — including Microsoft Corp., Gap Inc., and Eli Lilly and Co. — after suspecting them of making false statements about consumer privacy policies. "Privacy is hugely important," said Jessica Rich, an assistant director at the FTC. "Its profile is just as high as ever."

According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center’s complaint, a defense contractor in Huntsville, Ala., Torch Concepts Inc., received information on 5 million JetBlue passengers in September 2002 as part of an airline security project.

The contractor had hoped to develop a system using demographic data to identify potential terrorists among airline passengers, a task it described as finding "a needle in a haystack without knowing what the needle looks like," according to a presentation Torch Concepts gave on the project to a defense industry association in February.

JetBlue’s information was insufficient to create an accurate model, however, according to that presentation, and in October 2002, Torch Concepts purchased demographic information on 40 percent of those passengers from Acxiom.

That information included passengers’ sexes, whether they owned their homes and how long they’d lived there, incomes, number of children, Social Security numbers, occupations, and number of vehicles, according to Torch Concept’s presentation.

Acxiom’s information allowed Torch Concepts to "develop an acceptable database," according to the contractor’s presentation, and conclude that "known airline terrorists appear readily distinguishable from the normal JetBlue passenger patterns."

Torch Concepts had claimed it needed the additional information for a project to improve "military base security," not airline passenger screening, according to an Acxiom statement issued Tuesday.

Torch Concepts did not return phone calls Tuesday.

The privacy rights group’s complaint quotes Acxiom’s privacy policy, which states that the company "believes individuals should have access to information a company has about them," that notices should be provided that "explain the collection, use and distribution" of personal information, and that "most importantly, individuals should have the choice to opt out of the use of their data."

The complaint states, "There is no evidence that Acxiom provided notice to or obtained the consent of any passengers whose personal information was sold to Torch Concepts."

Acxiom denies it violated its own policies. In a statement issued Tuesday, it said its policy states that it provides personal information to "government agencies for the purposes of verifying information, employment screening and assisting law enforcement."

Ingram said: "Data is a critical element in making our country safer. In this case we believe the data was being used to protect the men and women on military bases who are helping protect us."



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acxiom; cappsii; jetblue; tia; torchconcepts; wesleyclark
Calls to Clark’s campaign staff were not returned Tuesday.

If Wesley Clark is Big Brother, the voters have a right to know. He can't dodge the question forever. What did Acxiom get in return for the $300,000 annual payment to Wesley Clark?

1 posted on 09/24/2003 10:08:54 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Sometimes people in a position of power lose perspective on right and wrong," Shelton said.(Retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Hugh Shelton does NOT support Clark for prez.)

"That question makes me wish it were vodka," said Shelton. "I've known Wes for a long time. I will tell you the reason he came out of Europe early had to do with integrity and character issues, things that are very near and dear to my heart. I'm not going to say whether I'm a Republican or a Democrat. I'll just say Wes won't get my vote."

2 posted on 09/24/2003 10:24:56 AM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; seamole; Mo1; Peach
He might not be involved in the JetBlue matter. Other info we have here says he was on commission to acquire direct government contracts. One such contract, unfulfilled, could be the software for DARPA's "Total Information Awareness" orwelllian computer.

Anyway, it looks like we on the net are creating a stir...good job Hal.

3 posted on 09/24/2003 10:44:59 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

bump


4 posted on 03/28/2005 10:37:19 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: timestax

Scandal rocks Acxiom!


5 posted on 03/28/2005 10:49:26 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timestax
S C A N D A L !
6 posted on 03/28/2005 11:03:48 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Acxiom denies it violated its own policies.

How often have we heard statements like that, eh!

7 posted on 03/28/2005 11:07:01 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

deny Deny DENY


8 posted on 03/28/2005 11:10:19 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: timestax

lies


9 posted on 03/29/2005 9:34:20 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bump


10 posted on 03/29/2005 9:35:00 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: timestax

won't go away, sowwway!


11 posted on 03/29/2005 1:28:24 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: timestax

BUMP


12 posted on 03/29/2005 1:37:09 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: timestax
ACXIOM-LIES
13 posted on 03/29/2005 1:59:06 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pocat

ping


14 posted on 03/29/2005 2:10:07 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bttt


15 posted on 03/29/2005 2:36:21 PM PST by theOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Hmm... Of course, we can't try to predict future terrorist activity by analyzing past terrorist activity: 99% young Arab male, 99% Muslim. With the PC police blocking the most obvious and potentially helpful leads, screening for terrorists has indeed become difficult.
16 posted on 03/29/2005 2:44:12 PM PST by TChris (Just once, we need an elected official to stand up to a clearly incorrect ruling by a court. - Ann C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson