Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KSL taking a pass on 'Coupling'
Ogden Standard Examiner ^ | Sat, Sep 20, 2003 | NANCY VAN VALKENBURG

Posted on 09/20/2003 10:59:32 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Second station taking stance that NBC sitcom too racy

KSL Channel 5 announced Friday that it will not broadcast "Coupling," a new NBC sitcom scheduled to debut at 8:30 p.m. Thursday.

KSL judged the series to be too sexually oriented and too crude and explicit in its sexual humor.

"KSL 5 Television will not air the new NBC series "Coupling," due to content not suitable to KSL standards," program director Russ Crabb said.

"The whole show is basically strong sexual content," he continued. "It"s not particular scenes in the show; it"s that the whole show is strongly sexually oriented."

"Coupling" is based on a British hit of the same name, which in turn was based on the hit NBC series "Friends," now entering its final year. KSL does air "Friends."

"It goes a few steps beyond "Friends," " Crabb said of "Coupling." "That"s the way NBC has been promoting it, and it lives up to the bill."

An NBC spokeswoman released the following response: "The show was reviewed by NBC standards and practices, and was considered appropriate for the network. It"s unfortunate that not everyone will have the opportunity to make their own viewing decisions."

The NBC press Web site describes "Coupling" as "a hip and frisky look at the ever-evolving relationships between six singles who are either involved, formerly involved or looking to become intimately involved with each other."

KSL is the second station with church ties to refuse to air the show. KSL is owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The only other station that has refused to air "Coupling" is WNDU Channel 16, the South Bend, Ind., NBC affiliate. WNDU is owned by Notre Dame, a Catholic university, said station president and general manager Jim Bahling.

"In our judgment, "Coupling" goes beyond the boundaries of what is acceptable in this particular market," Bahling said.

"In at least the first three episodes we have seen, the show seems to be a collection of crude sex jokes that, when taken in total, go far beyond what is appropriate for free broadcast television. And in our market and in the Mountain time zone, it"s an 8:30 show. Children are still up, and we see that as a problem."

WNDU and KSL also made the same decision not to run "God, the Devil and Bob" when NBC put that controversial, animated prime-time series on the air in March 2000. WNDU does air "Saturday Night Live," which KSL elects not to air. "Saturday Night Live" airs on KUWB Channel 30 in the Utah market.

"God, the Devil and Bob" was pulled by NBC after just a few episodes due to low national ratings. "Coupling" could stay on the network longer because it airs on NBC"s highly rated, high-revenue-earning Thursday-night lineup. "Coupling" is in the hammock position between established ratings-winners "Will & Grace" and "ER."

"We were hoping to run this show, and we wrestled with it over the summer," said KSL"s Crabb. "When you put a hole in your Thursday-night programming, that is not a decision you make lightly. It isn"t something we did on a whim. We understand the gravity of it, and the show"s importance to NBC. We just hope people understand this issue"s importance to us. It was a decision we had to make."

KUWB has been offered the option of airing "Coupling," but it will not announce a decision until next week, after officials have had a chance to view several episodes, a station spokeswoman said.

KSL and WNDU are both struggling to find programming to fill the 8:30 p.m. time slot. Bahling said the ideal would be a syndicated sitcom that would appeal to the same audience that tunes in for "Will & Grace" and "ER."

Easier said than done, Crabb said, since all of Utah"s stations have their syndication contracts in place, and many of the desirable sitcoms are already committed.

"We haven"t made the decision of what"s going in there yet," Crabb said. "But with the timing, it will probably have to be a syndicated show we already have."

You can reach reporter Nancy Van Valkenburg at 625-4275 or nvan@standard.net.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: hollyweird; nbc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
This is the main reason that I don't watch network sitcoms anymore. Why does EVERYTHING have to be sexual innuendo? It's not that I'm really offended by it, I just get tired of it. The stuff on TV "for mature audiences" is nothing of the kind, it's for stupid immature audiences.
1 posted on 09/20/2003 10:59:32 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I have two rules ,I don't watch people **** and I don't watch them fish. Theres nothing in it for me.
2 posted on 09/20/2003 11:06:22 AM PDT by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
No doubt.
3 posted on 09/20/2003 11:08:10 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
ER is still going?
4 posted on 09/20/2003 11:08:41 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket (One day I'll have to watch network TV, but that day is not now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
"Coupling" is in the hammock position between established ratings-winners "Will & Grace" and "ER."

That right there tells me just how far the alphabet networks have dropped into the gutter. That's why I mostly watch the History Channel, Discovery Channel, TLC, and programming like that. The alphabet channels have nothing left to offer me. Between their obnoxious sitcoms and communist liberal "news", they would do the world a favor if they would just go away.

5 posted on 09/20/2003 11:12:17 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
KSL and WNDU are both struggling to find programming to fill the 8:30 p.m. time slot. Bahling said the ideal would be a syndicated sitcom that would appeal to the same audience that tunes in for "Will & Grace" (snip)

Well thats certainly an improvement over watching a bunch of heterosexuals ... NOT!

6 posted on 09/20/2003 11:12:24 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort (Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
I didn't know that "ER" was still on, either. I skip right past the alphabet channels' primetime lineup.
7 posted on 09/20/2003 11:13:17 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Yep. IFC (Independent Film Channel) and Bravo have been showing "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" and "Boy Meets Boy". There's two more channels I've programmed out, so add me to the list of "bigots" who have a problem with the media's outright promotion of the homosexual lifestyle.
8 posted on 09/20/2003 11:25:33 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Yep, the channel switch and the off switch are the best censor there is. I don't know why more people don't use 'em instead of moaning about what everyone ELSE watches.
9 posted on 09/20/2003 11:39:37 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort (Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The original "Coupling" on BBC is funny and racy but I have no illusions on how the US version will turn out.
10 posted on 09/20/2003 11:42:16 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"Why does EVERYTHING have to be sexual innuendo?"

So true.
11 posted on 09/20/2003 12:45:48 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Why does EVERYTHING have to be sexual innuendo?

Yeah, some couplings are just plain dirty and people shouldn't be watching them anyways.

12 posted on 09/20/2003 12:49:06 PM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Everything I've read about the US version is that it has all the sexual innuendo of the British version and NONE of the humor. Yes, for some reason on American broadcast television the JOKES about sex are taboo, but actual simulations of it and references to it are just fine.

Also, the British version stars people that actually look like real human beings - the sorts of people you would expect to be in their mid-30s and still looking for permanent partners - while the NBC version went out of its way to find the hottest actors and actresses they could get their hands on.

The US "Coupling" will bomb. Mark my words.

13 posted on 09/20/2003 12:51:39 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
YOu can guarantee that the racy will be there, but it's the funny that they always seem to leave out.
14 posted on 09/20/2003 12:52:00 PM PDT by Hildy (SUCKER: Short-sighted Uncompromising Conservative Kool-Aid-drinking Elitist Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Why does EVERYTHING have to be sexual innuendo?

Because in order to pull in the largest possible audience, they have to dumb things down by appealing to the lowest common denominator.

15 posted on 09/20/2003 12:56:27 PM PDT by Fraulein (TCB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Except on Animal Planet and National Geographic!!!
16 posted on 09/20/2003 1:01:40 PM PDT by Max Monroe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The History Channel was showing a sexually explicit movie last week - and they are also showing very "politically-Correct" (left-wing radical) opinionated shows.

So much for an "educational channel - it's going the way of PBS
17 posted on 09/20/2003 1:31:38 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"When you put a hole in your Thursday-night programming, that is not a decision you make lightly. It isn"t something we did on a whim. We understand the gravity of it, and the show"s importance to NBC.

What's so important about Thursday night? I just happened to read the answer to this the other day.

Tim Goodman's column at sfgate: TV 101 - Everything you always wanted to know about the tube

"What's the most profitable night of the week for networks, and why?

Thursdays. Because that's when all the movie companies buy ad time, particularly if their movie opens the next day. So if you get a Thursday hit --

"Friends," "ER," "Survivor," "CSI" -- you can charge more for your ads, thus offsetting your license fees."

18 posted on 09/20/2003 1:42:15 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
Yeah, the Discovery Channel pissed me off last week, too. They aired a show about global warming that would have made Al Gore proud. I watched it for about 20 minutes before I just couldn't stand it anymore. They were showing smokestacks and moaning that people are ruining the earth's climate. There's one little fact that the enviro-socialists just can't gloss over: volcanoes put out over 1000 times the "greenhouse" gases that anything man-made does.
19 posted on 09/20/2003 1:50:59 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
That's interesting, I had no idea.
20 posted on 09/20/2003 1:51:31 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson