Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAPIST SHOWING LEG: An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme
9.19.03 | Mia T

Posted on 09/19/2003 5:22:58 AM PDT by Mia T

RAPIST SHOWING LEG: An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme

by Mia T, 9-19-03

The missus clinton-Wesley Clark spectacle, in any permutation or combination, is as much about delusions of grandeur as about anything else. As Susan Estrich pointedly stated yet again last night: "hillary is unelectable."


(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

The clinton calculus, that the clintons' utter failure, which unleashed global terror, would be neutralized (or at least mitigated) by any general -- and no less a general who, himself, exudes critical elements of clinton dysfunction -- is ludicrous on its face and yet another example of that unique brand of clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.

Missus-clinton-flirting-to-run-by-proxy -- the rapist is the one showing leg -- is merely an extension of the original clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme. (With her legs and political skills, the substitution is perfectly understandable.)

And the leftist media is falling for it like a homely, desperate old maid.

The clintons are betting that media desperation, coupled with her late entry-- and of course, the old clinton standbys, access journalism and plain intimidation -- will mitigate against any serious vetting of the little missus.

The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy alone that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.

From this it follows that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, not only is she vulnerable in '06, but in this post-9/11 world,

as more clinton failures and betrayals are documented, increasingly favorable demographics will prove insufficient to resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous democrat demagogues like the clintons.

Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.

 

George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL, SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

 



eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

EPILOGUE: (ADDITIONAL AUDIO)
Hear Christopher Shays: "The bottom line: HE DID RAPE BROADDRICK."

CNN's favorite general, Wesley Clark, has also been heard to opine that our troops are getting bogged down in Iraq. His competence to judge American generals is questionable since his command was limited to working for NATO. We prefer to hear from American generals. Clark's contribution to international relations consisted of mistakenly bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. In his zeal to prevent troop casualties, he ordered pilots to fly at such high altitudes that the pilots complained that they were being forced to incur unnecessary civilian casualties.

The enemy within

 

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

play tape

 

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*

(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary (oops!) talks
virtual hillary is the REAL hillary clinton
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; accessjournalism; bullclinton; clintoncorrruption; clintonfailure; clintonineptitude; clintonrapes; clintons911; hillaryclinton; hillaryraped2; losingbinladen; rapist; rthedsnuts; theterrorismstupid; unbecoming; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2003 5:22:59 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I especially liked being reminded Susan Estrich thinks Hitlery is unelectable. I need reminding of that every morning.
2 posted on 09/19/2003 5:27:21 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...
RAPIST SHOWING LEG:
An Extension of
the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme
Q ERTY8PING

3 posted on 09/19/2003 5:43:59 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BARBRA; All
Q ERTY6 utter failureBUMP
Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

Q ERTY9

BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

video screen capure

multimedia

President's Remarks
video image view

This country has many challenges. We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents, and other generations. (Applause.) We will confront them with focus and clarity and courage...

Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a President can make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering of war have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is free from sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and we dread the days of mourning that always come.

We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail. (Applause.)

State of the Union Address by President George W. Bush


4 posted on 09/19/2003 5:48:12 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good morning Mia
bttt
5 posted on 09/19/2003 6:48:37 AM PDT by firewalk (thanks for the ping)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Estrich, herself, is a victim of rape. That fact must factor in on some level....

Q ERTY3BUMP

GORE ON CLINTON RAPES-THE VIDEO

YOO-HOO missus clinton: THE CLINTON RAPES ARE
"UNBECOMING"
eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)


thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson


6 posted on 09/19/2003 6:55:56 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BeforeISleep
good morning :)
7 posted on 09/19/2003 6:56:28 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good morning, Mia T.
I whole heartedly agree with the premise of your post.
Hillary! will NEVER subject herself to a real campaign...
it would unmask her, once and for all, revealing the inept,
self- righteous, dishonest, hypocritical, screeching
harridan we all know her to be.
8 posted on 09/19/2003 7:03:08 AM PDT by MamaLucci ( Clinton met with Monica more than he did his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

The clinton calculus, that the clintons' utter failure, which unleashed global terror, would be neutralized (or at least mitigated) by any general -- and no less a general who, himself, exudes critical elements of clinton dysfunction -- is ludicrous on its face and yet another example of that unique brand of clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.

Mia T, RAPIST SHOWING LEG:
An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme

 


The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com


 

Tracing Clark's military map

By Jack Kelly
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published September 19, 2003



    Retired Gen. Wesley Clark has thrown his helmet into the ring. He has improved the Democratic presidential field by entering it, just as he improved the Army by leaving it.
    Gen. Clark is a brilliant man, and a brave one. A Rhodes scholar, he was decorated three times for heroism as commander of an armor company in Vietnam.
    "Those of us who knew him as a captain thought the country would be shortchanged if he didn't rise to very high rank," said a retired Army colonel who was a student of Wesley Clark's when Gen. Clark taught at West Point.
    But Gen. Clark's kindergarten teacher probably noted he doesn't play well with others.
    Gen. Clark "is able, though not nearly as able as he thinks, and has tended to put his career ahead of his men to the point of excess," said a defense consultant well acquainted with the Army's senior officers. "He is opportunistic and lacks integrity. He will be an absolute menace if he gets into a position where he can exert influence on the Army because he lacks true vision and is prone to be vindictive."
    Gen. Clark "regards each and every one of his subordinates as a potential threat to his career," said an officer who served under him when Gen. Clark commanded a brigade of the 4th Infantry Division in the 1980s. An officer who served under Clark when he commanded the 1st Cavalry Division said he was "the poster child for everything that is wrong with the general officer corps."
    Gen. Clark doesn't get along terribly well with superiors or with allies either, which lead to his premature departure as commander of NATO.
    Gen. Clark was CINCEUR when the Kosovo war began, and bears much of the responsibility for President Clinton's decision to try to bomb Serb dictator Slobodan Milosevic out of Kosovo. Gen. Clark argued that after a few days of bombing, Mr. Milosevic would fold his tent and slink away. When the Serbs didn't budge after months of bombing, Gen. Clark lost Mr. Clinton's favor.
    As the war dragged on, Gen. Clark advocated the use of ground troops. This put him at loggerheads with Gen. Henry Shelton, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and with Gen. Eric Shinseki, chief of staff of the Army, who thought this was a terrible idea. These generals faulted Gen. Clark for getting America into an unnecessary war, and for having done a poor job of preparing for it.
    "NATO did not expect a long war," wrote former Clinton national security aide Ivo Daalder. "Worse, it did not even prepare for the possibility."
    The conduct of the war drew unprecedented criticism from Gen. Clark's predecessor, Gen. George Joulwan, and a quiet rebellion by subordinate commanders.
    "Clark found his control over ongoing operations eroding," wrote retired Army Col. Andrew Bacevich. "Rather than the theater commander, he became hardly more than a kibitzer."
    What may have triggered Gen. Clark's early departure from NATO was a confrontation with the British general who was to command NATO peacekeepers.
    After a Serb surrender had been negotiated with the help of the Russians, Gen. Clark ordered British Lt. Gen. Michael Jackson to parachute troops onto the airport at the Kosovar capital of Pristina, so NATO would hold it before Russian peacekeepers arrived.
    Gen. Jackson refused. "I'm not going to start the Third World War for you," he told Gen. Clark, according to accounts in British newspapers.
    Shortly after the confrontation with Gen. Jackson, Gen. Clark was told his tour as CINCEUR would end two months early. Neither Gen. Shelton nor Defense Secretary William Cohen attended his retirement ceremony, a remarkable snub for a four-star general.
    Gen. Clark read Mr. Milosevic wrong, helping to provoke the Kosovo war, which he then fought badly. Gen. Clark picked up where he left off in his second career as a television kibitzer of military operations. As an analyst for CNN, Gen. Clark harshly criticized the war plan for Iraq devised by Gen. Tommy Franks, the CENTCOM commander, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Gen. Clark turned out to be completely wrong.
    It says something fascinating about the Democratic field that this failed general is the class of it.
    
    Jack Kelly, a syndicated columnist, is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh (Pa.) Post-Gazette.
    



Copyright © 2003 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
Return to the article

9 posted on 09/19/2003 7:44:54 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...
JACK KELLY MUST-READ PING
10 posted on 09/19/2003 7:54:08 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jla
PING
11 posted on 09/19/2003 7:54:41 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Nice job Mia.

BUMP!
12 posted on 09/19/2003 7:58:29 AM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Bet you that somewhere along the lines he and Tommy Franks had a run in because according to this article he is very vindictive and he had nothing good to say about a fine General Franks and his superb command of our efforts in Iraq! Go ask the troops - Rush had a guy on yesterday who worked "across the desk" from Clark and this caller said Clark was awful to work around and would make a terrible commander in chief! I hope those who worked around Clark step forward in the coming months and expose this idiot!
13 posted on 09/19/2003 8:43:47 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Psychopaths are often witty and articulate and almost always "glib."

A signpost to this trait is often a smooth lack of concern at being found out." [Hare, 35].

and see themselves as the center of the universe, as superior beings who are justified in living according to their own rules."

Sometimes they pair up with other psychopaths and become a close team, one may be a "talker" while the other is a "doer," and so forth,

They can be "amusing and entertaining conversationalists, ready with a quick and clever comeback, and can tell unlikely but convincing stories...

They can be very effective in presenting themselves well and are often very likeable and charming. To some people, however, they seem too slick and smooth, too obviousely insincere and superficial. Astute observers often get the impression that psychopaths are play-acting, mechanically "reading their lines." [Hare, 35].

...They may "ramble and tell stories that seem unlikely in light of what is known about them. Typically, they attempt to appear familiar with sociology, psychiatry, medicine, psychology, philosophy, poetry, literature, art, or law.

One psychopathic individual I knew claimed that he had a genius IQ and that he was studying several different majors at college.

"When I found out I had a genius IQ, that's when all my trouble started" he said. I asked him, "Why?" He replied, "'Cause I'm too smart for my own good."

In the end I found out these were lies because he was, in fact, a high school drop-out.

Despite their failures, psychopaths have a very "narcissistic and grossly inflated view of their self-worth and importance, a truly astounding egocentricity and sense of entitlement, [Hare, 38].

They often come across as "arrogant, shameless braggarts--self-assured, opinionated, domineering, and cocky. They love to have power and control over others and seem unable to believe that people have valid opinions different from theirs. They appear charismatic or 'electrifying' to some people." [Hare, 38].

I know exactly what Hare means when I recall one person I used to know (who had been diagnosed); he always seemed to be charming everyone around him, although in the end every woman who fell for him ended up becoming hostile when they realized all he had been doing was leading each one on simultaneousely.

The psychopath is callous, remorseless, and unempathetic, although at first glance he may not seem that way. He is often exceedingly witty, chameleon-like, charming (but not always, especially when not in a "good" mood), the person who attracts a circle of admirers around him at every party, but more often that not, he is usually avoided -- once people find out what he's really like.

Psychopaths often end up associating with others like themselves, although in some cases they don't always get along that well.

Sometimes they pair up with other psychopaths and become a close team, one may be a "talker" while the other is a "doer," and so forth, although I strongly believe that these roles are interchangeable when dealing with a psychopathic duo. Hare states, "As long as their interests are complimentary, they make a formidable pair." [Hare, 65]. It has also been reported that some acquaintances may never really discover their truly dark side.

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/psychopath.htm

14 posted on 09/19/2003 11:40:11 AM PDT by Helms ("Nietzsche's critique of ressentiment - the "self-poisoned mind" - fits Islam like a glove")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia T BUMP.

But, I'll believe she's unelectable when she and her wife, Billy J. Pervy Boy, are both gone from the political scene forever. Never underestimate the power of the complicit media to sway half of the 'Merican Public to "like" her.

I don't even like calling her "her", since that is such an insult to real women.

15 posted on 09/20/2003 12:04:34 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet; MamaLucci
Q ERTY4BUMP
Hamilton (or Madison) discussed the importance of wisdom and virtue in Federalist 57. "The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust."
 
(Contrast this with clinton, who recklessly, reflexively and feloniously subordinates the common good to his personal appetites.)
 

Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON


 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.
 

Mia T, THE ALIENS

Because of the synchronicity, because of the brazenness, because of the balkanizing, because the ruling is an attempt to disenfranchise the right, because the ruling increases Davis' chances to prevail (and, therefore, clinton's apparent electoral effectualness), because, if Davis prevails, the clintons are strengthened and the Kennedys are weakened, because California control is necessary for clinton redux, and because this ruling at once sticks it to Bush, (his Bush v. Gore argument provides the equal-protection precedent), and stymies the Supremes, (would they really have the political courage to revisit this?), direct clinton involvement in this decision cannot be ruled out.

Mia T, EPILOGUE: THE 9TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)

 

Clinton letter in English. Click for full size.

Clinton letter in Spanish. Click for full size.


16 posted on 09/20/2003 1:26:28 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
America, are you listening? Are you comprehending the truth? Hillary Clinton is the most dangerous woman in this country.

Keep up the great work, MiaT.

17 posted on 09/20/2003 7:22:13 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
bttt
18 posted on 09/22/2003 11:16:29 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Faith; jla; Helms

 



New York Post

DAVIS' SOP TO TERRORISTS: GROUNDS ENOUGH FOR RECALL

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?


September 22, 2003 -- I read Rich Lowry's column ("Terror Made Easy," Opinion, Sept. 13) and realized why this country has a sign on its back that reads kick me.

Where is homeland security? Why can't California revoke the rights of illegals to get driving licenses? Instead of taking strong steps to abort this type of asinine policy, Tom Ridge states that states enact such a policy "at their peril."

Wrong. They do so at our peril. Illegals should not be given any such right, and this type of political correctness or political pandering should never even be suggested, let alone passed into law.

Paul Alexander

Staten Island

 

Absent a crime, recalling a democratically elected governor is a bad idea, but Gray Davis' pandering to illegal aliens by granting them legal drivers licenses is dangerous.

If President Bush is serious about homeland security, he will veto any bill that contains one dime of funding for states like California, as well as all "sanctuary" cities.

Joseph A. Ciccolini

West Orange, NJ

 

Now that Gov. Gray Davis of California has signed a bill that would allow illegal aliens to obtain drivers licenses (a reversal of his previous posture), the other 49 states should begin asking holders of California drivers licenses for additional ID.

It is appalling that in these times of terrorist activity, a state would contribute to a breach of national security. It is no small wonder that Davis is the subject of a recall vote.

Chuck Eckstein

Brooklyn

 

Gray Davis, in a desperate bid to pander for minority votes, supports a bill that would enable illegal aliens to obtain California drivers licenses. That's a very generous reward for breaking the law.

No doubt, terrorists have taken notice. It should expedite the acquisition of phony identities for any who desires it.

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?

Pat Sobota

Staten Island

 

How is it that nightclub managers of yesteryear had more common sense than California's legislators and its desperate Gov. Gray Davis? In the 1970s and '80s, nightclub managers and door attendants would require that partygoers present valid IDs to assure that only adults were allowed in.

For the safety of their patrons and the preservation of their business and liquor licenses, most teenagers with bogus dime store IDs would be turned away. California's government, on the other hand, shows no such concern for the safety and self-preservation of its citizens.

Hilda Malagon

Jesus E. Moreno

The Bronx

 Home


19 posted on 09/23/2003 6:41:29 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jla; All

It is critical to think out of the box, beyond California. For the clintons, the California recall election is no less than a proxy for their war with the Kennedys for the control of the Democrat Party (and the country).

EPILOGUE: THE 9TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)

 


clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."

If ever there was
a counterexample
to Tip O'Neill's old saw
("all politics is local"),
it is the recall...
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary (oops!) talks
virtual hillary is the REAL hillary clinton
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism


MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror



The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)


UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."


eyes wide shut (she knew… she raped, too)


A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

Q ERTY8BUMP

20 posted on 09/23/2003 7:04:22 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson