Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Battle of the Recall: Read How it Began
WWW. davisrecall.com ^ | By Eric Hogue, KTKZ AM 1380 Talk Show Host

Posted on 09/18/2003 12:29:09 PM PDT by tophat9000

The Battle of the Recall: Read How it Began

By Eric Hogue, KTKZ AM 1380 Talk Show Host

How serious are the people of California about the recall effort of Gov. Gray Davis? In two hours time, I had my answer—and the answer to the future of California.

I was unsure of the announcement. We had the exclusive story on 1380 KTKZ, in Sacramento. I confirmed the date, Tuesday, Feb. 4—it would be a weekday morning at 6 a.m. We would supply the "daily Gov. Davis fiscal mismanagement facts" and then provide the opportunity.

No ad campaign, no promotional remote, no run up of daily on-air announcements—just a simple conversation and an offer: a legitimate recall effort was underway in the city, and the first 65 people to sign the citation would be patriots.

Would the people of Sacramento respond? Did they still believe that there is something to fight for in this golden Golden State?

The answer came fast and furious. I interviewed the organizer of the recall, People's Advocate Director Ted Costa, at 6 a.m. on the morning of California's new beginning. Ted Costa was relaying the physical location of his office. The instructions: "If you are angered about the mismanagement of Gov. Davis' leadership and you are a registered voter, stop by before work and start the constitutional process of recall."

In a matter of 45 minutes, we had 50 patriots cramming Costa's small office at Arden Way and Watt Avenue in Sacramento. By 8 a.m., more than 275 patriots visited the office and signed the line of protest. When it was all said and done, a little bit after 8:45 that morning, over 350 people visited the office, signed the citation and called the show to proclaim their efforts in saving this great state.

It's a ringing endorsement that this governor is running on empty, from Republicans, Democrats and Independents alike. As much as the governor will try to make this a partisan attack, the truth tells a different story.

His veto on the "car tax" legislation has earned him more enemies than friends in his own camp. Davis would love to add the "car tax" to the budget-grab for the fiscal fix, but he knows how Democrats feel about the "Terrible Triple Tax."

A recent state employee union survey reported that 37 percent of the registered Democrats were in support of raising the car tax, while 61 percent were opposed. Even among the most loyal, hardcore Democrats, increasing the car tax was opposed by a margin of 52 percent to 46 percent.

Davis now hopes that the Assembly Democrat leadership, under the direction of Speaker Herb Wesson, will apply the emergency status to the "VLF" (car tax) and force it through with the usual fear-factor tactics of the left. Scare the seniors and threaten the lesser informed that security will subside if the car tax does not triple.

For the Republicans, the car tax is an issue that stimulates images of a ready militia. Under the direction of Col. (Sen.) Tom McClintock, over 5,000 citizens (The State of California Tax Militia) volunteered to operate the gathering of signatures for a referendum on the car tax. Over 5,000 volunteers in less than a week with only talk radio as the outlet—makes one wonder what will happen when talk radio is afforded 160 days to encourage 890,000 signatures for a recall. I'm sure it makes the governor wonder too!

But it is not just the car tax, it is his storied history of fiscal mismanagement. Most recently, the legislature authorized $76.7 billion of spending last September and now Davis has run it up over $80 billion for this year—all the while holding press event after press event to talk about what he is doing to slash spending.

Davis is not concerned about fixing the "fiscal nuke." He is more concerned about escaping with his political life. So he bets his future on the past—and places a good amount of his blue chips on the stupidity of the state's Republican Party. Will the party that leads the state's fiscally conservative stand up and join the "Battle of the Recall"?

The first early excuse from the Republican communicators state: (1) "The recall effort is too early; they should have waited until after the tax hikes and the budget cutbacks took hold."

A key principal of business is that "time is money." I don't believe the wise move is to wait until after the small businessmen and women are suffocating under the pressure of taxation without representation and relief.

The next excuse states: (2) "The recall is too Republican, they risk being perceived as sore losers."

This is a weak concern from the GOP. This recall from the People's Advocate is non-partisan—it is being organized by taxpayers, not elephants on parade. And, on the issue of sore loser, what tax-paying citizen doesn't believe that he or she is a sore loser in the face of this leadership in Sacramento?

Finally, the intelligent crowd states: (3) "The recall campaign has no strategy. What if it fails and Davis beats the rap and gain leverage for a presidential run in 2008?"

The intelligence of "what if"—what if it fails and he wins? What if we, as a Republican Party, put down the infighting and bickering over dated newsletters and articles and actually fight for the people and risk finding unity along the way? What if?

Maybe we'll find a re-energized Republican party, fiscally sound leadership and a new direction for California. Maybe we'll find a leadership that mirrors the effort and passion of 350 tax-paying patriots on a simple Tuesday morning, willing to volunteer in the militia of tax revolt and engage in the "Battle of the Recall."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: recall; tedcosta; tommcclintock
Note that the state party big wigs where not behind the Recall...
1 posted on 09/18/2003 12:29:09 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
The Party bigwigs were AGAINST the recall at both the State and national levels.

It started one monning when Melanie Morgan on KSFO asked Shawn Steel if it was possible. Steel said he would investigate it and came back on a few days later and laid out the deal. It was go from there.

Howard Kooligan called the White House to ask for help, and was derisively told, "let California twist in the wind. It will help us in 2004."

Conservatives started this recall. The CAGOP titans stepped in to highjack it only when they realized it was a done deal. The jury is out whether Arnold entered the race to win it or to terminate it.
2 posted on 09/18/2003 12:39:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; All
...Gov. BustaMEChA in 2003 =

...President HILLARY in 2004




.."IS it SAFE?" = President HILLARY

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1556
3 posted on 09/18/2003 12:46:18 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Yea ... highjack is the right term...

On another thread they were slaming Tom on "the stop the car tax by referendum" ignoring that the Dem pull a stunt to block a referendum and per this articles Tom’s referendum team got redirect in to the recall............. Where was Arnold?

4 posted on 09/18/2003 12:46:41 PM PDT by tophat9000 (The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Note that the state party big wigs where not behind the Recall...

Who now presume to tell us who to vote for.

5 posted on 09/18/2003 12:50:04 PM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
False premise.

A conservative can still win in this state. If Arnold is elected he, Rove, and Parsky will make certain that there will NEVER be another conservative candidate for statewide office. Bank on it.
6 posted on 09/18/2003 12:53:42 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
A conservative can still win in this state. If Arnold is elected he, Rove, and Parsky will make certain that there will NEVER be another conservative candidate for statewide office. Bank on it.

abso-fricking-lutely!

7 posted on 09/18/2003 1:02:14 PM PDT by tophat9000 (The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Bank on it.

Gov. CRUZ BustaMEChA =

-Spanish 1s Language in California
-California reports to Mexico 1st
-President HILLARY in 2004
http://www.Freerepublic.com ..ends
8 posted on 09/18/2003 1:03:10 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I haven’t seen a snaking like this since the last time I called Roto Rooter
9 posted on 09/18/2003 1:06:49 PM PDT by tophat9000 (The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

10 posted on 09/18/2003 1:08:17 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Grow up. If Simon came as close as he did one-on-one against a Gray Davis who had lied about his supposed $8-12 billion deficit, after an awful campaign in which his own party was stabbing him in the back and depriving him of funds, then a competent conservative such as Tom McClintock can win a multi-candidate race as long as those who would prefer him vote for him.

This whispering campaign of yours and Arnold's supporters, citing the viability of Bustamante, is racist, divisive, and falsely based. You'd be surprised how many hispanics support him.
11 posted on 09/18/2003 1:09:57 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Correction: You'd be surprised how many hispanics DON'T support him (Bustamante), particularly because of his stance on abortion and taxes.
12 posted on 09/18/2003 1:12:16 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I haven’t seen a snaking like this since the last time I called Roto Rooter.

I have a hunch that much of it was either paid for in advance or is the product of the "Log Cabin Republicans." It came on too quickly and contiguously for it not to have been an organized effort.

13 posted on 09/18/2003 1:14:55 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Well Rove, and Parsky had to move fast .....they sank all the conservative candidates in CA to set up the grand move left of the GOP in 2004......the conservative and the recall really screwed up there timetable...

14 posted on 09/18/2003 1:24:29 PM PDT by tophat9000 (The price for Tom to drop is ....Parsky goes ....let Tom have the CA party purse strings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
...71% of the Spanish-Americans in Santa Ana, California rejected BustaMEChA's personal bullying phone calls supporting their School Board President NATIVO LOPEZ's press to teach their kids Spanish 1st in their Schools.

...This Voter rejection resulted in NATIVO LOPEZ's being recalled in February 2003, our 1st of 2 successful Recalls in California this year. So, I'm not surprised at all by what following BustaMEChA has amongst the State's Latino Voters.

...But there's lots of other Democrats out there who will follow their Pied Piper BILL & HILLARY CLINTON anywhere, and some who won't = ARNOLD for Governor Votes.

...I don't see many Democrats moving over to vote for TOM McCLINTOCK in any case, if he stays in the Race. And his staying in the Race makes it so much harder for any Friend of the USA to win in California in 2003 =

...President HILLARY in 2004
15 posted on 09/18/2003 1:44:53 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
"Bustamonte For Governor."

Translated into Spainsh is:

"BustaMEChA Por Hefe Del Mexifornia!"

16 posted on 09/18/2003 2:14:30 PM PDT by PsyOp (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson