Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlurking
They are included in most Linux distributions. They aren't Linux, or even part of Linux, at least in terms of who is "responsible". They are maintained by separate teams of developers, and blaming "Linux" would be like blaming Microsoft for a bug in Photoshop.

Of course, that doesn't stop your side from lumping vulnerabilities in IE or Outlook or IIS into Windows. You want your cake and eat it, too -- decrying "Windows" vulnerabilities and simultaneously claiming that any vulnerability that isn't in the Linux kernel isn't Linux. Pathetic weasels.
68 posted on 09/15/2003 8:31:10 PM PDT by Bush2000 (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Bush2000
Of course, that doesn't stop your side from lumping vulnerabilities in IE or Outlook or IIS into Windows.

Microsoft themselves claimed (in court) that IE was an integral and unseparable part of Windows

Personally, I wouldn't claim that IIS is part of Windows, even though it was on the Windows distribution disk(s). It took a separate, overt action on the part of the user to install it.

However, the problem with comparing a Windows-only application from Microsoft to an open source application that happens to run on Linux is that Linux is usually only one of the supported platforms.

In only a quick scan, I can identify several of them that also run on Windows: Mozilla, Ethereal, PHP, Apache, VNC, Lynx, Netscape, MySQL, and Ghostscript all have Windows source and binary distributions, although I don't know if they were exploitable. If you want to attribute them as Linux security problems, then they are potential Windows security problems as well -- even though they are not Microsoft products.

72 posted on 09/15/2003 8:55:11 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Bush2000
IE is according to MS part of the operating system! IIS is a microsoft product Apache has nothing to do with Linux and runs infact on windows..
110 posted on 09/15/2003 10:07:59 PM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Bush2000
Of course, that doesn't stop your side from lumping vulnerabilities in IE or Outlook or IIS into Windows. You want your cake and eat it, too -- decrying "Windows" vulnerabilities and simultaneously claiming that any vulnerability that isn't in the Linux kernel isn't Linux. Pathetic weasels.

As usual, b2k convieniently fails to take into account that it was microsoft that claimed IE was a part of the core OS in front of a federal judge.

I guess it's o.k. to lie if it's for the cause of spreading MSFud.

151 posted on 09/16/2003 7:05:51 AM PDT by zeugma (Hate pop-up ads? Here's the fix: http://www.mozilla.org/ Now Version 1.4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson