To: AntiGuv
No, the issues in this case have nothing to do with the issues in
Bush v. Gore. And I say that as a lawyer who filed one of the winning briefs in the first
Bush case.
John / Billybob
315 posted on
09/15/2003 11:11:22 AM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: Congressman Billybob
No, the issues in this case have nothing to do with the issues in Bush v. Gore. And I say that as a lawyer who filed one of the winning briefs in the first Bush case.Congratulations. Filings and rulings have unintended consequences. You should know that. See my post #328.
346 posted on
09/15/2003 11:15:19 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Congressman Billybob
How does this ruling (if upheld) square with Article II of the California Constitution, which states:
SEC. 15. (a) An election to determine whether to recall an officer and, if appropriate, to elect a successor shall be called by the Governor and held not less than 60 days nor more than 80 days from the date of certification of sufficient signatures.
Wouldn't moving the recall election to March violate the California constitution?
351 posted on
09/15/2003 11:16:04 AM PDT by
Cooter
To: Congressman Billybob
Can you tell us about that?
438 posted on
09/15/2003 11:33:11 AM PDT by
carton253
(All I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11/2001)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson