Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IDF to US: Use more armor in Iraq
Jerusalem Post ^ | Sep. 14, 2003 | ARIEH O'SULLIVAN

Posted on 09/14/2003 3:30:23 PM PDT by yonif

In light of the steady killing of US servicemen in Iraq, a senior IDF officer had some advice for the American forces there: Start using heavily armored vehicles and more tanks.

"When the bodies of more American boys return in plastic body bags, the Americans will learn they have to start driving in armored cars," said the senior IDF field officer.

At least 155 US troops have been killed in Iraq since US President George W. Bush declared the war over on May 1. The latest was Sunday when insurgents fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a Humvee, killing one soldier and wounding three. The attack occurred in Fallujah in apparent retaliation for the accidental killing of 10 members of a local security force by US forces, apparently mistaking them for resistance fighters.

US forces come under fire more than a dozen times daily in Iraq. Most of the fatalities are from attacks on Humvee vehicles. These are only equipped with "soft sided" light armor, which is not effective against RPGs, and their windows are not bulletproof. The Bradley fighting vehicles, on the other hand, are very heavily armored.

Israel uses heavily armored Humvees and APCs in the territories as much as possible and sometimes employs heavy main battle tanks as battle taxis. A senior IDF officer said that the army would continue to use tanks against Palestinian gunmen no matter how damaging to Israel's image overseas.

"The IDF uses tanks and Special Forces and everything it can to beat the Palestinians according to a consideration of what is good for us. If we don't have an alternative to tanks, then we use tanks," he said.

"I don't care how it looks on TV in California. My consideration is to protect our forces and if we hadn't used tanks then we would have had greater number of casualties," the senior officer said. According to the senior commander, the Americans sought Israeli advice on waging an urban war prior to the Iraqi invasion. Most Israeli commanders have enormous praise for the speed and swift success the US military showed in the initial campaign to conquer Iraq.

"The Americans created a strategic shock through air power and special forces. They shaped the battlefield during the course of the war and showed remarkable flexibility," said commander of a main IDF battle group.

Israel is enjoying a benefit of a boost to its deterrence by the American show of power since Arab armies know that the IDF's capabilities, using US weaponry, are similar to the American capabilities. According to top IDF officers, the effect of maintaining and developing its large armored-based ground forces is a deterrent to Arab countries, which decided long ago not to attempt to reach tactical parity with the IDF.

"The moment they understood that capability they opted for the other options, like using proxies to wage campaigns and developing weapons of mass destruction," said the senior officer. But he strongly insisted that no major change in Israel's strategy of maintaining a mighty ground force potential was likely.

The officer said the IDF would reduce its battle order, but that force multipliers that have come into fruition have been introduced and the firepower, maneuverability, and command and control of the IDF Armored Corps today makes them far superior than past larger formations.

"Even if there were not the economic problems facing the nation today, we have understood for some time the need to trim down the [ground] forces," he said. "Israel is taking the older tanks, saluting them, and getting new ones. This is the time to do the reorganization in the IDF, but we won't be taking risks."

"When a general says there is significant force, he isn't just saying it to scare someone. He needs to know he has the capability to stand behind this statement," the senior commander said. "The IDF divisions are very, very powerful."

"Every change that we undertake in the IDF is based on strengthening the IDF through introducing newer items and getting rid of older ones. On land, sea, and air.

"There is a reduction in the size," the senior officer said. "But the IDF is not for one moment giving up on the need for a strong army. A state defends its sovereignty with military might even if there isn't a threat."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armor; idf; iraq; us; war; waronterrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2003 3:30:23 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
Stryker... Some think it's a death trap.. but, it's way better than a Humvee..

And with the slat armor, it should be able to withstand serious attacks.

IMO, they need to make a Stryker with DU armour (ala the M1A2) and two engines (to account for heavier armour). Sort of a shield that will protect the front and rear of a column.
2 posted on 09/14/2003 3:35:04 PM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Arab countries, which decided long ago not to attempt to reach tactical parity with the IDF.

Bright lads, three strikes and you're out!
3 posted on 09/14/2003 3:49:28 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Afternoon, Yoni. Well I guess (sadly) that the the IDF would know.
4 posted on 09/14/2003 3:54:55 PM PDT by Libertina ("Leaders" cannot lead me without my consent. I, citizen, have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

At least 155 US troops have been killed in Iraq since US President George W. Bush declared the war over on May 1. The latest was Sunday when insurgents fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a Humvee, killing one soldier and wounding three.

US forces come under fire more than a dozen times daily in Iraq. Most of the fatalities are from attacks on Humvee vehicles. These are only equipped with "soft sided" light armor, which is not effective against RPGs, and their windows are not bulletproof. The Bradley fighting vehicles, on the other hand, are very heavily armored.
Time for more Bradleys
5 posted on 09/14/2003 3:58:03 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Indeed. They have been fighting such warfare for over 50 years.
6 posted on 09/14/2003 3:58:44 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Back at CPAC this year?
7 posted on 09/14/2003 3:59:10 PM PDT by Libertina ("Leaders" cannot lead me without my consent. I, citizen, have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Yup. College republican chairman at my college said they will be chartering buses this year too.

Let's hope this years CPAC won't be during a tragedy (like last year's, during the shuttle disaster).

8 posted on 09/14/2003 4:02:43 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yonif
At least 155 US troops have been killed in Iraq since US President George W. Bush declared the war over on May 1.

President Bush never said that this was the end of the war. President Bush said that it was "the end of major hostilities." What is it with these dolts? These assholes can't even recite / write down their names and then they think they can write a column filled with BS. Well, speaking of BS, maybe a FReeper can remind the hypocrite living in CA that she needs to talk to the new husband. Sick couple. Babs is an intellectual boob.

9 posted on 09/14/2003 4:06:13 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I know, that was pretty intense, but a good group to be with when such a thing occurs...
10 posted on 09/14/2003 4:07:22 PM PDT by Libertina ("Leaders" cannot lead me without my consent. I, citizen, have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yonif
A lot of this Iraq After Action Report says the same thing. One recommendation that I really liked in it is a request for the development of anti-personnel rounds for the 120mm main gun on the Abrams. High velocity beehive rounds or WP would be one Hell of a shock weapon. I'd bet the IDF would be interested in the development of these as well. (The Palis would definitely prefer it if the IDF had never heard of it.) Let's see, 40 pounds of flechettes at 4,300 ft/sec......hmmmm....Nothing like crowd control.
11 posted on 09/14/2003 4:12:10 PM PDT by 11B3 (Two choices: Republican or Communist. You know it's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif; Travis McGee
When was the last reported use of a RPG-7 by the PLO /Hamas ect in Israel ?

Stay Safe !

12 posted on 09/14/2003 4:13:35 PM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Travis McGee
Reports of anti-tank missiles

http://www.israelnn.com/search.php3?word=anti-Tank

Reports of RPG usage

http://www.israelnn.com/search.php3?word=RPG

13 posted on 09/14/2003 4:16:16 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Heavy armor is not transformational according to our sec def. Sec Def Rum says that we do not need any of that heavy stuff anymore, can't get it there quickly, and it moves too slowly. Nor do we need more troops according to him, unless they are foreign and perceived as a happy face by Iraqis. This cuts down the number of troops needed according to the civilian Pentagon, uh leaders. They seem to get confused about whose a$$ to cover first...

I agree that the humvees were thought to be sufficient while those of good faith to the conservative cause waited for the rose petal toss, but now that we missed that

bring them on,
bring on the Bradleys,
couldn't agree more.




george wythe wrote:
Time for more Bradleys
14 posted on 09/14/2003 4:19:08 PM PDT by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Thank You Yonif..........Stay safe !
15 posted on 09/14/2003 4:28:21 PM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
Yup, more armor and more flachettes. Every Faggot allah buggerer on the planet is on his way to IraQ to get his 72 sex slave virgins. I suggest we accomidate the little demons.
16 posted on 09/14/2003 4:28:52 PM PDT by STD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
I’ve dealt with these huge governmental bureaucracies before, and I agree with you that the Pentagon has been too slow to react to the changing circumstances in Iraq.

If this had been an issue of offering food stamps or welfare checks, I would have had more patience.

Unfortunately, this is a life-or-death issue; I see Americans being killed every day, and I’m not happy about at all.

There is no reason for our GIs to be enforcing traffic laws or chasing carjackers in Iraq. None. Iraqis should be doing all the policing, since it’s been several months since the Saddam Hussein was deposed.

I’m tired of hearing about excuses not having trained all the needed Iraqi police officers. The latest suggestion was to ship them to Hungary for training at a US base, starting later this month, IIRC

17 posted on 09/14/2003 4:32:34 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I don't care how it looks on TV in California.

And neither do I.

18 posted on 09/14/2003 4:37:02 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I even saw a report about something that they hang on or around those armored vehicless that either catch the RPG round or cause it to explode before hitting the actual vehicle. It almost looked like netting to me. They said it was effective, but not widely used yet... Question: WHY? for the life of our soldiers.

One thing you can say about the Israelis: they learn from experiencse and their mistakes... So, why do we have to learn from experience and our mistakes when someone else has already learned it for us?

You never learn success from the failures! You learn success from the successful!

19 posted on 09/14/2003 4:45:00 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
IMO, they need to make a Stryker with DU armour (ala the M1A2) and two engines (to account for heavier armour). Sort of a shield that will protect the front and rear of a column.

They had a fantastic solution for the ambush problem way back in Vietnam...gun trucks. Worked like a charm. Perhaps this is something worth looking into.


20 posted on 09/14/2003 4:46:36 PM PDT by WestPacSailor (Sorry folks, this tagline's closed. The moose out front should have told you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson