McClintock on Hannity Show Now!

Sean Hannity Show ^ | 9/10/2003 | Pyro7480

[Pyro7480]

McClintock talking to Sean Hannity right now...

[Bluntpoint]

After this stupid election we all will get back to our normal lives.

[Amerigomag]

Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)

I sense your frustration.

You, however, have some responsibilty for the resolve of that 10%. You've been here longer than I. You're nearly a founding father.

You're participation in this forum has strengtened the forum and thereby provided a voice in the wilderness for that 10%.

Almost cold irony, eh?

[Bluntpoint]

Poobah has been posting here way to long, his mouse needs a break.

[ambrose]

Finally, the obsession with McClintock makes Schwarzenegger look weak. If he is such a strong candidate, why can?t he simply go out and campaign rather than worrying about who else is running?

This was a quote from Dan Weintraub.

The voting has started. Do you not think it a reasonable request to ask the trailing candidate to please withdraw? Does such a request meet the level of obsession in your eyes. I don't think so. This was a lie. Yesterday you made a quote of a Schwarzenegger comment stating it was made yesterday. It was actually stated the day before, but you have to have some issue you can dig him over each day, so you lied.

I said that Arnold made the "right-wing crazies" remark "today" at around 1:00 a.m. So yeah, Arnold technically called Prop 54 supporters "right-wing crazies" yesterday as opposed to today. This is your evidence that I am a liar?

[Poohbah]

You, however, have some responsibilty for the resolve of that 10%. You've been here longer than I. You're nearly a founding father.

You're participation in this forum has strengtened the forum and thereby provided a voice in the wilderness for that 10%.

And it's given an opportunity for realistic discussion.

Some of that 10% has realized that constantly insulting the 90% of the party that doesn't agree with them on every single jot and tittle of "true conservatism" isn't going to win elections, and that half a loaf is better than none.

[PhiKapMom]

I respect you as much as anyone on this forum and your post back to Ambrose at #276 was right on the mark. Hard for me to believe that people that call themselves conservatives can spin and lie so much on here about the CA Recall.

There are names I have never seen on here calling the rest of us RINO's! If the rest of McClintock's supporters are like what I have witnessed for the last few weeks, his campaign is in big trouble. Don't understand why McClintock would stay in the race to the bitter end if it means electing Cruz.

If he does stay to the end of the race, then he might as well forget ever getting Republican support for anything! Most "True" Republicans don't like spoilers that put their own agenda ahead of what is best for the people and right now McClintock is setting himself up to be the spoiler!

[Diddle E. Squat]

Why won't you answer a simple question:

Are you Rick Hansen? Yes or no.

An answer to a simple question will clear everything up immediately. Not answering just swirls more speculation, sidetrack arguments, etc. Don't you routinely argue about how McClintock is the straight shooter and Arnold is evasive, how Tom is not afraid to answer any question, while Arnold ducks questions, thus Arnold is not a good Republican? So why then are you not following McClintock's lead and directly answer a simple question?

[ambrose]

A simple yes or no would have sufficed. If you are a lawyer that is part of the ACLU lawsuit to stop this election, then you owe this forum the Truth. You never did answer but you sure did spin! Even if you turn out to "not" be a lawyer working on the lawsuit, your evasive answers were unworthy of a Freeper IMHO! Absolutely no reason to be evasive and/or spin! A simple "yes" or "no" was all that was required!

I am under no obligation to respond to ridiculous allegations. Funny how only the hysterical RINO Arnold Groupies thought I was an ACLU lawyer. Certainly Aloha Ronnie nor anyone else on the original thread thought I was doing anything but posting an entry from a prominent election law lawyer's blog.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Ignore post #287, I unfortunately misspelled Rick Hasen as Rick Hansen. Sorry for the mistake, so let me restate that post:

Why won't you answer a simple question:

Are you Rick Hasen? Yes or no.

An answer to a simple question will clear everything up immediately. Not answering just swirls more speculation, sidetrack arguments, etc. Don't you routinely argue about how McClintock is the straight shooter and Arnold is evasive, how Tom is not afraid to answer any question, while Arnold ducks questions, thus Arnold is not a good Republican? So why then are you not following McClintock's lead and directly answer a simple question?

[PhiKapMom]

Most of as you call them "moderates" have been on this forum for a long time and we are not "moderates" BTW! As much as all of your would like to portray us a "moderates" facts fly in the face of all of your allegations.

Been on this forum since January 1999 and find it strange that people with sign up dates that go back a few years have screen names that I have never come across before. And I have posted a lot on this forum. Just asked someone who has been here longer than I have and he hasn't seen your screen names either.

Would you care to explain why that is? What gives, don't want the rest of us to know who you really are? Would like to know who is calling us "moderates" since that couldn't be farther from the truth!

[Stew Padasso]

Was your megalomania diagnosed at that age? (r)nies seemed to consume him a little too much, even later on. I have to admit that I like (r)nold, but when quotes like that pop up, you have to wonder about his motivation. You know there is another one, I'll have to go dig into my favorites....

[PhiKapMom]

LOL!!!! See that you do really like to spin like a lawyer. A simple yes or no would have sufficed -- no more spin! Trying to turn it back on Arnold supporters is a Clinton trick as well!

[nutmeg]

FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

[Registered]

If you are that attorney in question you need to:

1) Get some sun

and

2) Put some muscles on that skinny frame.

'course, that's just my opinion.

[DoctorZIn]

Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

[DoughtyOne]

To: DoughtyOne

Finally, the obsession with McClintock makes Schwarzenegger look weak. If he is such a strong candidate, why can?t he simply go out and campaign rather than worrying about who else is running?

This was a quote from Dan Weintraub.

You copied it from Weintraub and posted again without commentary in a post of your own.  If you weren't trying to reinforce this unsupportable comment you wouldn't have done so.  It isn't true.

The voting has started. Do you not think it a reasonable request to ask the trailing candidate to please withdraw? Does such a request meet the level of obsession in your eyes. I don't think so. This was a lie. Yesterday you made a quote of a Schwarzenegger comment stating it was made yesterday. It was actually stated the day before, but you have to have some issue you can dig him over each day, so you lied.

I said that Arnold made the "right-wing crazies" remark "today" at around 1:00 a.m. So yeah, Arnold technically called Prop 54 supporters "right-wing crazies" yesterday as opposed to today. This is your evidence that I am a liar?

Today is the 10th.  Check this out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/978808/posts
Then check this out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/979327/posts?page=48#48

Your original comment regarding when this was stated was non-factual.  Now your explanation is revealed to be non-factual as well.

If you would be a little more reserved in your comments, I wouldn't have so much problem with you.  You go over the top consistantly with regard to Schwarzenegger.  When I addressed this issue with you, in the comments above, I touched on the daily aspect of your comments.  You stated something to the effect of "...what should we expect tomorrow?", which caused my comment about you trying to pin him on something new each day, which I felt necessitated your need to claim this was stated yesterday.

284 posted on 09/10/2003 5:13 PM PDT by ambrose (I'm a Right-Wing Crazy, and Proud of It!)

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you for your kind comments. You may find this post of interest too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/979852/posts?page=296#296

As I have said before, I wouldn't have posted one post in support of Schwarzenegger if the McClintock people hadn't gone negative on him. It was my opinion that desiminating 26 year old information, lies and half-truths were indefensible.

I don't know ONE person that is a true conservative who behaves this way. True conservatives stick to the truth and honest evaluations regarding that truth.

[PhiKapMom]

I don't know ONE person that is a true conservative who behaves this way. True conservatives stick to the truth and honest evaluations regarding that truth.

I don't either. These people posting remind me of Clintonites with their continual spin and lies. We have almost all been in flame wars on here one time or another but I have never seen the venom and the name calling I have seen on these threads. Being called a RINO is turning into a joke when you stop and think who they are calling RINO's now -- we are all in pretty company.

I recognize very few screen names that have been doing the most spinning and name calling. Boggles my mind!

[DoughtyOne]

I just looked up a guy whose name I'd never seen before. He's been here since 1998. That seemed fishy to me.

[cyncooper]

Considering Arnold's socialist agenda including Pro-Gay, Anti-Gun, against Prop 54, not supporting illegal driver's license referendum (not to mention Pro-Choice...), support for letting illegals stay here, won't take a "no new tax pledge", Buffett, Lowe, Reese, etc. etc., etc.,

Why exactly are we supposed to support this guy?

If I had posted this leaving out Arnold's name, would you guys presume I was talking about a liberal Democrat???

Since you completely misrepresent Schwarzenegger's positions your point is moot.

BTW, Lowe came out strong in defense of the war in Iraq and stated that the best way to support our troops was to support our commander in chief. This was back in February or March. Now, he supports President Bush and now Schwarzenegger, so I protest his name being presented as proof that whoever he supports must be a lib.