To: Jim Robinson
I consider this to be a legitimate news story dealing with the SCO v Linux controversy and would appreciate it staying in the main forum. Thank you.
2 posted on
09/08/2003 2:10:28 PM PDT by
Coral Snake
(Biting commies, crooks, traitors, islamofascists and any other type of Anti American)
To: Coral Snake
Only when the courts rule in favor of SCO will I give them a dime. Until then they can kiss my rear.
To: Coral Snake
Linux reseller Gary Sandine, chief technology officer at Los Alamos Computers, in Los Alamos, N.M., which owns and ships many GNU Linux computers, said that despite numerous calls to SCO, he has been unable to talk directly to a salesperson.
Why would he want to talk with SCO?
10 posted on
09/08/2003 2:47:10 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: Coral Snake
I wish I knew who coined this wonderful phrase:
You can't spell fiasco without SCO!
15 posted on
09/08/2003 3:20:01 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Coral Snake
OBTW, there was an
article on GROKLAW yesterday about someone in Ireland trying to inquire about Linux run-time licenses from $CO. Also
here is the guy's blog.
To: Coral Snake
It would seem reasonable to inquire exactly what is being licensed. Exactly what code is covered?
23 posted on
09/08/2003 6:25:36 PM PDT by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson