"We've become too specialized," said General Byrnes, the head of Training and Doctrine Command here. "Ask a junior enlisted who they are, and they'll tell you, `I'm a mechanic,' not I'm a soldier. We need to change that culturally in the Army." So beginning next year for soldiers and in three years for officers, the Army plans to formally inculcate what it calls a "warrior ethos" throughout the ranks.
General Byrnes seems to get it.
We'll see. It's nice to see Shinseki's Clintonistas going away with one last catty speech at a retirement ceremony, anyway. But this new guy still raises a few questions, I think.
- Why don't we show we're serious, like the Marines, and return to combat-oriented basic training, with the sexes trained separately, like the Marines?
- some unlikely combatants — its cooks, mechanics and other support troops who are normally far from the front lines. These guys have been likely combatants since the invention of Blitzkrieg. (That was around the time Henry Ford started selling the V-8 engine. Eisenhower was a Captain, and the Army was failing to fly the air mail). The Army pulling its head out of wherever it's been, and suddenly perceiving the problem, doesn't mean the problem's new.
- the Army has too many soldiers who have lost touch with their inner warrior, said Gen. Kevin P. Byrnes, the Army's top training general. Well, no joke, Sherlock Holmes, TRADOC has dropped everything to try to put them in touch with their nurturing, feminine side for the last ten years or so.
- So beginning next year for soldiers and in three years for officers, the Army plans to formally inculcate what it calls a "warrior ethos" throughout the ranks. This guy isn't exactly on fire with urgency, is he?
- Army officials here said that emphasizing a warrior mentality throughout the ranks had been under way for 18 months. One word: Bullshit.
- prepared to fight on a battlefield, like Iraq, without traditional front lines and rear areas. The Army has been talking this talk since the 1950s but they have yet to walk the walk. You would think that the Army never fought guerillas before (what were the Indians, for crying out loud? Or the Phillipine Insurrection, 100 years ago?). Naw, it's just that a lot of the generals majored in Phys Ed and never read a book since.
- freshly commissioned second lieutenants would take a new six-week basic leadership course after receiving their commission.... General Byrnes said four pilot programs had been conducted at Fort Benning, Ga., to test the concept for officers and proved successful... This is not new, and he's not describing it honestly. What they have been doing is sending soldiers from all branches to the first six weeks of the Infantry Officer Basic Course, and the reason they have been doing it is, to work out the bugs in sending women to IOBC. In the process, they have reduced IOBC, which was never exactly Ranger-tough, to female level. That's great; we'll be sending officers to the tournament who have all only golfed from the ladies' tees. And as far as proving successful, it was command-defined as a success from the beginning, no real testing was done, and no contrary opinions (which are plentiful) were welcome.
- Similarly, the warrior mindset will be included in enlisted soldiers' nine-week basic training courses and their speciality training after that, beginning next year. Bwahahahaha! This is a tacit admission that "the warrior mindset" is absent from basic training. Pretty amusing as Pentagon flacks have been swearing on the Hill it's as good as it ever was, a fiction even they don't really believe.
- Support troops could be tested on marksmanship twice a year, like infantry soldiers, instead of annually, as they are now. While testing is important, if there is no training we might as well collect up the guns and give them Wrist Rockets. Training means you need to make time (i.e. cut some of the 100+ hours of social indoctrination crap) and spend money (since ammunition can't be bought equally in 435 House districts, it isn't popular on the Hill).
- the new credo for all soldiers is "put the mission first, refuse to accept defeat, never quit and never leave behind a fellow American." That this is new to the Clerkocracy of the Army ought to be a scandal.
- "The question is, do they think they feel like a soldier?" General Barrett said. No, you ignoramus, it's do they perform like soldiers. The enemy doesn't give a damn about their ickle feelings. and neither should you. You need to focus on performance.
One final thought: While mechanics occasionally have to fight when things go badly, it's more important in the grand scheme of things that they be good mechanics. But they need to know their weapons. About ten of our Iraq KIAs have been kids who were shot by themselves or their buddies, usually because someone who was poorly trained was playing wannabee Ranger with a gun. Every one of those cases leaves a family in ruins, and every one is because the training base (i.e. TRADOC) failed to train the soldiers to be comfortably familiar with their weapons, and their unit leadership failed to lead them. if you started relieving COs and 1st Sergeants when a unit was negligent with firearms, you would at once be removing failed leaders and saving American lives. Unfortunately, to most generals an officer's career has more weight than a private's life.
We have a great Army, but the greatness often comes despite the men at the top, not because of them.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F