Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Affordable-housing law OKd
Chicago Tribune ^ | 8/27/03 | Amanda Vogt

Posted on 08/27/2003 9:47:27 AM PDT by TastyManatees

Affordable-housing law OKd
Highland Park puts requirement on developers

By Amanda Vogt, Tribune staff reporter. Freelance reporter Julie Ewart contributed to this report

August 27, 2003

Prompted in part by complaints that young people cannot afford to raise families in the community where they grew up, the North Shore city of Highland Park has approved what an observer called a "precedent-setting" zoning ordinance requiring a portion of new multifamily developments to be reserved for affordable housing.

The ordinance, passed unanimously by the City Council Monday night, requires 20 percent of new multifamily residential construction with five or more units to be set aside for affordable housing, officials said. The city defines "affordable" as housing priced within reach of a family of four earning $56,500 to $90,000.

Under the ordinance, which takes effect Oct. 1, the average affordable housing unit in Highland Park would sell for about $180,000, compared with a 2002 median home sale price of $430,000 in the suburb, said Lee Smith, a Highland Park senior planner. Last year, the median sale price for new single-family construction in the city was $1.1 million, he said.

The ordinance is necessary, Smith said, because developers have not provided housing for a broad range of incomes. Many Highland Park natives have been forced to live outside the city, he said, and elderly residents struggle to pay rising property taxes.

"Diversity has been declining, with most of our rental units lost and many of the small houses in the $300,000-to-$400,000 range torn down to make way for more expensive homes," Smith said.

The only affordable housing constructed in Highland Park in the last 20 years is the Sunset Woods senior housing complex, which the city built, Smith said.

"The ordinance recognizes that the private sector needs assistance," he said.

Scott Goldstein, vice president of policy and planning for the Metropolitan Planning Council in Chicago, called Highland Park's actions "precedent-setting, not only in Illinois, but nationally."

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: affordable; affordablehousing; develop; highland; housing; zoning
"The ordinance recognizes that the private sector needs assistance." Wait, was there a market breakdown? Was the taxpayer-supported infrastructure facing a threat from the higher priced units? Was there even an excess supply of the higher priced units? Nope. The "private sector" was doing just fine, clearly someone could "afford" all the houses they were selling. What the city planner means is that he meant to "assist" them in determining the best use of their private property in a way which would guarantee political support. It was an out-and-out theft, and the funny part is that it will likely result in reduced supplies of "affordable" housing long after this joker has moved on. Why build in this socialist town, when you can build 10 miles over at a higher profit margin?

Tasty Manatees
1 posted on 08/27/2003 9:47:27 AM PDT by TastyManatees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
I wonder if they'll be next to Michael Jordans house??


I don't get this whole thing. So you can't live in your hometown- big freakin deal.
2 posted on 08/27/2003 9:52:03 AM PDT by retrokitten (That Simpson. He thinks he's the Pope of Chili Town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
I don't get this whole thing. So you can't live in your hometown- big freakin deal.

You must not have read the bill of rights in the Leftist version of the constitution: "You have the right to live in an expensive neighborhood, even though you don't have a job, or work a minimum wage job because you dropped out of school at 15 to sell drugs and don't have any real skills. If you cannot afford to live in a nice neighborhood the gummint will pass a law saying the builders must sell you a home at below market value so you can feel good about yourself. Then, since you cannot afford to pay property taxes in your city, we will give you gummint assistance, food stamps, and free medical care, all paid for by the hard working folks who had to pay full market value for their homes."

3 posted on 08/27/2003 9:56:40 AM PDT by WestPacSailor (I keep pressing the escape key, but I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Yes, this is so typical. A liberally minded government decides to tweak the market. Again the cry is affordable housing for those who can't afford it. Sounds nice but the result it predictable... Slums, higher crime rates and entrapped poverty.

Slums because these folks won't be like the typically city dwelleres and will be seen as different (despite governmental attempts at mind control). With the difference some in the 'affordable' housing will want to take advantage, through five-finger discounts, crime will escallate in the city and spread. The affordable housing will not be attractive for future buyers so any buyers will have to rent to get out of the situration, leaving entrenched slums.

When will govenments ever learn that the market is based on dynamics that govenments can't change without severe side effects. I feel for those young who can't start the big jobs in the big city. Sometimes you have to start out somewhere else and then land the bigger job where you want to live. It's a tough lesson, but better learned that way than being in the slums.

4 posted on 08/27/2003 10:03:09 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Every so often, we get to see the birth of some truly horrendous ideas. This is one of those times. Just let the idiocy soak in....
5 posted on 08/27/2003 10:03:19 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
called Highland Park's actions "precedent-setting, not only in Illinois, but nationally."
Um, no. It's rent control applied differently, and it didn't work.
6 posted on 08/27/2003 10:14:45 AM PDT by BMiles2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
What really happens is mostly the "connected" and those willing to pay bribes get into such affordable housing. The application process is rotten as heck.
7 posted on 08/27/2003 10:21:13 AM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Many cities have instituted this program. When I bought my current home three years ago the City of Davis required the developer to "set aside" a certain number of lots for affordable units. Low and behold of the six units which were subsidized 3 went to builder relatives and one was fraud where the individual bought two for investment. At the end of the day these units have increased between 100K-150K and will all be on the market soon since the three year residency requirement is up. Great deal if you can work it.
8 posted on 08/27/2003 10:22:30 AM PDT by davisdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson