Unfortunately, we've got idiots in office who believe we must spend money funding social programs for those who messed up their lives with their own behaviors and then claim they're victims of society.
I will support the legalization of drugs, prostitution, etc, etc, when all social programs are cut for "addicts" or "victims" of society. Until then, I'm just content to toss loaded phrases into these Libertarian threads. It's like hollering "Fire!" in the proverbial crowded theater. It makes for great sound and fury and signifies nothing....
Do you support banning alcohol because social programs benefit alcohol abusers? If not, why not?
Using one violation of rights (in this case, taxpayer-funded welfare) to justify another violation of rights (in this case, the War On Some Drugs) is not a conservative argument.